The Luck of Valentino

 

 

                                                                                                     

THE LUCK OF VALENTINO

(Tel Aviv 1956)

 

 I.  A SAD ACCIDENT

 

            The correspondence respecting the case of Omri Tal versus Solomon Vered and Movil & Co. Ltd was dumped unceremoniously on my desk late in the morning, on a heavily clouded day in early spring,  by Jacob Keren, sole proprietor of J. Keren & Associates, Advocates, of Rothschild Boulevard,  Tel Aviv.  A short choleric man in his late fifties, with thick glasses, receding hair and a loud metallic voice, he was – as was his wont – in a foul mood.

“I can’t understand why this idiotic matter has been sent to us. Ruth Schwartz ought to handle such a simple case from her smart desk at Rotem.  Find out why she passed it on to us, will you, Eli?”

“When do you need the answer, Mr Keren?”

“Yesterday!!!” he muttered.

“I’ll attend to it over lunch,” I heard my mute reply.

“Very good! And – before I forget – think who would be good person to handle the case! And that file of Kadmon you are working on can wait:  he sat on it for three months!”

“Very well, Mr Keren!”

“And, Eli, did I see you yesterday in ‘Habimah’?”

“I was there. I love Peer Gynt! Where were you seated?”

“Circle, 3rd Row! What did you think of the performance?”

“Excellent. But I wish Finkel had curbed his Russian accent!”

“You can’t expect everybody to speak Hebrew like a Yekke!”  He retorted, departing before I had a chance to recover.

            It was fortunate that the last exchange took place in 1958. Three years earlier on, when I had joined Keren’s firm during my last year in Law School, his pungent retort  would  have crushed me.  My long spell in  his firm,  taught me to take Jacob Keren’s acid tongue with a pinch of salt.  To start with, it had dawned on me  that, like most Russian Jews, Keren respected the mid-European German speaking Jewry.  His jibes at the Yekkes camouflaged cultural envy. I had also worked out that Keren’s assessment of his staff was based on their performance. If you were good at your job, you could safely ignore his outbursts, tantrums and patent rudeness.

Jacob Keren’s mannerism did not endear him to his employees. Many banged the door never to return. On a few occasions, I, too, came close to quitting. Invariably, though, I decided to stick it out. Jacob Keren was a brilliant courtroom tactician, had a singularly sharp and methodical legal mind and was an excellent teacher. During my years in his firm, I grew from a starry-eyed law graduate into a realistic and down to earth lawyer.

            Placing Kadmon’s file in my ‘hold’ tray, I got stuck into the papers referred to me. Running quickly through them, I concluded that Keren’s outburst was well founded. The facts of the case were plain. Omri Tal, a young dental technician, had been riding home on his bicycle after a pleasant evening in a dancing club in Ramat-Gan. He was proceeding along a poorly lit and narrow stretch of road on his way back to Tel-Aviv, when a truck bumped into him. Fortunately, he escaped without head or back injuries.  But his right leg was a mess. His shin and thigh bones  sustained multiple fractures and his  knee  cap  was smashed. Omri spent eight days in hospital followed by six weeks at home, with his leg in a cast. The bones healed. But the report of his orthopaedic surgeon affirmed that a certain weakness would remain for life and that his knee would be stiff for years to come. A second orthopaedic surgeon, engaged by our clients – the Rotem Insurance Company –  confirmed that Omri’s injury was of a ‘permanent or semi-permanent’ nature.

            Omri Tal conceded  that the accident was caused in part  by his own ‘stupidity’. The charger, connected to the headlight of his bike, had been out of order for a few days and he had not “had the time to get it fixed or to buy a torch”.  His dark clothes exacerbated the visibility problem.  The driver, who had knocked Omri off his bike, was also at  fault. Solomon Vered had been on the road since 6.00 a.m. On his own admission, he had been ‘dead tired’ when he picked up his last load for the  day in Netanya. The delivery, though, was marked ‘urgent’.  The designated relief driver was ill in bed and Solomon Vered, whose son was in his third year in the School of Engineering, coveted the generous overtime pay.  He conceded that, had he not been ‘so exhausted’, he might have spotted Omri although the bike was without lights.

            The basic legal position was clear: the loss was to be apportioned based on the parties’ fault, which meant that each of them had to bear a part reflecting his contribution to the occurrence of the accident.  In the instant case, any lawyer practising in the field would have predicted a division of approximately fifty-fifty, with a possible variation of up to 10% either way depending on the facts emerging in the cross-examination. It followed that Rotem had to reckon with the payment of damages equalling about one half of the loss sustained by Omri.

            The difficulty in the case was in quantifying that loss.  Naturally, there was no argument about the amount due to Omri for  the money he lost during the eight weeks he was unable to work. His annual  income was about IL4,000. Accordingly, this loss amounted to about IL615.00. Rotem had agreed to pay half of that amount and was prepared to cover Omri’s medical expenses. In addition, the firm was prepared to pay an appropriate sum by way of  damages to compensate him for the pain  and sufferings he had sustained during the period involved.

            The  contentious element concerned two further claims made by Omri’s lawyers.  One was for loss of future earnings resulting from the permanent  injury  to his right leg. In a letter addressed to Rotem, Omri’s lawyer,  Boaz  Tamir, said that dental technicians did most of their work on their feet, standing by their bench or “moving about in their sophisticated workshops, equipped with kilns, moulds and other instruments placed on different work stations”. Omri’s accident was bound to slow him down considerably, reducing his foreseeable  future earnings by at least 50%. Taking into account all factors,  including the benefit derived by the payment of a lump sum ahead of the anticipated earnings, the damages so suffered were assessed at IL18,000.00. Ruth Schwartz, Rotem’s in-house legal adviser, expressed her strong disagreement in her reply.  Jacob Keren was less adamant. “Ask for further particulars,” was scribbled in the margin of our copy of Boaz Tamir’s letter.

            Omri’s other controversial claim had nothing to do with his profession. For the three years preceding the accident, he and his charming girl friend had  held the Israeli Dancing Club’s trophy for the Rumba and were also voted  the runners up in the Polish Folk Dances competition. Boaz Tamir  dealt with this aspect of the claim in a few  pungent sentences: “It is a shame that our  client’s  injuries – which will prevent him from taking part in further dancing competitions – have  deprived  the Israeli  World  of  Art  of  the stimulating  input of a most able and promising participant. It saddens us  to have to say that our client will never regain his skills as a virtuoso dancer. The quality of his life will, thus, not be the same as prior to the accident!”

The amount of IL30,000.00 demanded for the ‘ensuing loss of enjoyment of life and consequential mental pain’ made me gasp. Ruth Schwartz’s reaction had been equally strong.  In her reply, she described the claim as unreasonable and wildly excessive. On this point, Jacob Keren voiced his consent, scribbling: “Why not suggest the young man take up a less strenuous hobby like playing the piano or crossword puzzles?”

            Usually, cases of this sort ended with an amicable settlement. But Boaz Tamir was a tough, tenacious  and shrewd courtroom virtuoso. I had argued cases against him in mock trials during our days in Law School. Although I had bested him on fine questions of  law,  he had a knack of springing surprises on points of fact. Frequently, he pulled the rug from under the feet of myself and other adversaries by presenting fresh evidence or by twisting the tail of one of  our witnesses. He had put  his gladiatorial skills to good use after being called to the Bar. 

Ruth knew she was no match for Boaz. When he rejected her overture for a settlement, she decided to play safe. She passed the file on to her old pupil-master and first employer, Jacob  Keren.  His jaundiced remarks about the referral were triggered by his natural resentment of employees who left his firm to join the staff of one of his major clients. Although for all outward appearances he remained on good term with Ruth, he continued to smoulder about her desertion.

            I spent the next two hours on a further perusal of the documents. I soon noted that Boaz had cooked his figures. A meticulous search in our library established,  further, that the claim for Omri’s loss of future enjoyment on life was flawed. In his enthusiastic quest for justice, Boaz had conveniently forgotten that the law imposed on the injured party a duty to mitigate his loss. This meant that if Omri was no longer able to pursue his original vocation or hobby he had to look for suitable alternatives.  Encapsulating my conclusions in a short, handwritten  note, I added: “I suggest we call the plaintiff’s bluff:  in my opinion, Hannah Hod is the best person to take charge.”  Satisfied with my decision, I delivered the file to Jacob Keren’s secretary.  Then, just as the clock chimed 2.00pm, I rushed out to grab a sandwich for lunch.

 

                                            II.  TEAMING WITH HANNAH

 

             My choice of Hannah was partly explainable by the friendship I felt for her.  Although Hannah’s solid Hamburgese background differed in more than one way from my relaxed and light-hearted Viennese milieu, both of us were Yekkes. In a firm dominated by Russian Jews and Sabres this cultural affinity drew us together.  Every so often, when we felt alienated by the rough mannerismand Chutzpah  of  our colleagues, we reverted to German, earning hostile glances from those present.  In addition, Hannah and I shared a taste for books and for good films. Frequently, we lent German novels to one another and,  occasionally, went together to the cinema. Another, even stranger, bond was that both of us suffered from Asthma. When either of us came down with an attack, the other lent a supportive shoulder.

            A romance, though, was out of the question. To start with, Hannah was my senior  by some fourteen years, had been divorced by her husband after  twelve years  of an unhappy marriage and had a daughter aged ten. She had let it be  known that another involvement was not on the cards unless she met a man, in her own age group, who was certain to be a dependable companion and a model stepfather.  Obviously, I was not mister right. Another disincentive was Hannah’s down to earth and uncompromising approach to life. She was simply not of the material of which dreams are made.  Her plain looks, gaunt figure and sharp tongue did the rest. In the event, we had developed a relationship of sister and brother. It bound us together without producing the  undesirable side effects often associated with an affair.

             Professionally, too, Hannah  and I got on famously.  Her stamina and perseverance, her skill as a cross-examiner, her ready grasp of facts and her sheer doggedness made her an effective courtroom advocate. I had a more analytical and academic approach to legal problems and an inborn knack for spotting weak points. So, in effect, we complemented each other’s skills. When pitted together, we formed a formidable team.

        My recommendation that she take charge of the Omri Tal case was, therefore, dictated not only by  subjective but also by objective considerations.  She  would nip Boaz Tamir’s attempt to steal a march in the bud,  would know how to handle witnesses coached by him and, further, would thrive on piercing the veil of any demagogic or fancy argument Boaz chose to raise. My own role, I smiled inwardly, would be to undermine Boaz’s performance by placing traps on his course. This was the strategy I had used against him on previous occasions. 

            Although the Omri Tal case appeared lacklustre, I expected Hannah to take charge happily. There was, after all, room for imaginative manoeuvrings and for an apt cross-examination.  I was surprised by the scowl that  marred her  face when, two days after my conversation with Keren, she barged into my office and sat on the edge of my desk “I  thought you were my friend, Mr Eliahu Peter Berger!” 

“Never must you question me!” I adapted the classic Wagnerian phrase.

“Ha, Ha, Ha!” She retorted, letting her mouth drop. “But you better tell me – what made you ask Keren to assign this blasted Omri Tal case to me?”

“You are the best person for it!”

“Flattery won’t get you anywhere, Sir Galahad! That case is well within the brilliant horizon of Abraham Kadmon.”

“Kadmon is aging fast: he’s losing touch. He may confound the issues!”

“How about Ravid then?”

“He’ll accept an unfavourable settlement and walk to his club early in the afternoon for a drink!”

“So what? Rotem can afford to be generous, can’t they?”

“They can! But, Hannah, I’d like to outmanoeuvre Boaz Tamir!”

 “Using poor me to settle a score with your pal Boaz? What has he done to you lately? Stolen your girl friend?”

“No – Hannah – he is happily married to his Miri; and no – he  hasn’t done anything to me. He’s a nice chap and, actually, we’re close friends! But it’ll do him good to be pegged down from his Olympian heights!”

“So, you want to teach him a lesson out of friendship and brotherly concern.  Well, well, well – I didn’t know you were  such a caring person, my dear Eli. But, then, life is full of surprises.”

“And for you, Hannah, the case will be a respite: needed, after your recent six weeks trial with Keren in the lead. Just for once, you can do with a walk-over matter.”

“You  have a point there.” Hannah loss of weight and dry cough affirmed that working on a major case with a martinet like Jacob Keren took its toll. I was concerned. “Are we on then?”

“Do I have a choice? So  shall we have our orientation conference over lunch?”

             Like  most Israelis, Hannah and I relished Oriental cuisine.  David Mizrachi, the Yemenite owner of the eatery near the courthouse, knew us well and led us to a table by the window.

            For a while we gossiped about our colleagues and the office staff.  When our orders arrived Hannah turned to our case. It soon transpired that, like myself, she had spotted the errors in Boaz’s calculation.  We then  turned to the first fundamental issue: would Omri Tal’s handicap interfere with his work in the long run.

“My cousin lost a leg in the War of Independence,” said Hannah.  “But he’s still one of the best jewellers in Tel Aviv. So why can’t our Omri sit on his backside when he works!?”

“We better find out more about the work of dental technicians,” I voiced  my consent.

“I intend to,” said Hannah.

“And how about his dancing?” I prompted.

“This is the other main issue! We must accept that he won’t end up as the Israeli  Valentino!”

“If he ever had a chance. But, even if he did, he had shown no aspiration to turn himself into a professional dancer!”

“True,” agreed Hannah. “But he does not claim loss of earning under this heading. We’re talking about loss of future enjoyment of life!”

“Quite. But why can’t he find some other hobby? He’s young enough to pick one up!”

 “Ruth Schwartz’s secretary sent his photo over. Have a look.”

            The young, well built and good-looking man, whose face was brightened by a warm, ingratiating, smile could not be readily associated with libraries or literary circles.  His zest for life was bound to direct him to  beaches and, perhaps, to soccer. Here was an out of doors man, proud of his prowess in physical activities.

“Sooner or later this chap will be back on the dancing floor,” I said. “But then, Boaz doesn’t assert Omri will  never dance again. All he says is that his client’s wings have been clipped.”

“Quite. But Boaz will do his best to persuade our Omri to lay off. For a while, our Valentino will listen to him.”

“So, we have to bide our time,” I mused. “Putting a P.I. [private investigator: detective] on his tail too early may be counter-productive. Omri may spot him.”

“Precisely. I’ll give him six months. So, Eli – you know what do! And one more thing: I’ve not appeared against Boaz Tamir before. Do tell me a bit about him – is he a good courtroom lawyer?

“He  is  indeed: excellent on his feet, keeps his cool in  a  crisis, likes to lay traps and is quick to spot one placed by the other party. And his timing is spot on.  Still, he is not so bright when it comes to legal points: freaks out when things get complex.”

“How comes you know him so well? He graduated two years before you?”

“We  met  in the Debating Society.  Also,  we appeared  together and against each other in Moots. And we are friends:  don’t you make any mistake about this.”

“You must have been a first-class team when you joined forces.”

“We were. But he used to beat me when we crossed swords.”

“So that’s why you’d love to give him a black eye. But tell me, does he specialise in running down cases?”

“He doesn’t. Silver & Co.’s running down files are handled by Leah Sapir. Boaz specialises in  industrial accidents and building disputes.”

“That’s what I thought. So how comes he handles this file?”

“Omri may have been referred by a common friend?”

“No, Eli, no! Boaz would have passed the file on to Leah! I suspect Omri is one of his  personal friends!”

“But why does this matter?”

“Boaz will fight hard for a friend. We all do. So we have to be prepared. Also, I want to know where these two met! They can’t be school mates: Boaz is some five years older  than Omri! Were they brought together by some common interest or, perhaps, hobby?”

“Boaz hates dancing and I can’t visualise Omri in a debating club. But – hold on – Boaz likes to play chess. He’s not too good but, even so, he’s a member of the Emanuel Lasker Club.  He and his Miri love to watch tournaments!”

“So, we better find out if our Valentino finds respite from his exertions on the dancing floor in chess! If he is a good player, we’ll tell him to regain his zest for life in chess. I’ll get the relevant information from an old friend.”

“That would be excellent. So, we’re all set?”

“We  are. I better write to tell Boaz to direct all future correspondence and documents to us!” 

“Mind if  I do this?”

“Go ahead, Eli –  but why?”

“Because I shall use one of Kadmon’s standard letters. I’ll get his secretary to type it and, I am sure, she’ll dispatch it under ‘in reply please quote: `AK\zb’!”

“What’s the big idea?” Hannah let her surprise show.

“Boaz will think it’s Kadmon’s file. He’ll draft his documents and plan his strategy accordingly!!!”

            To my amazement, Hannah burst into peel of laughter, earning us the startled glances of patrons filling their stomachs on adjacent tables. “What’s so funny, Frau Hod?” I asked irked.

“You: my dear Eli!  When you first joined our esteemed firm, you sought to broaden our narrow  horizons by talks about Rousseau’s social contract and about natural justice. And look at you now! Still, you might as well go ahead and give your pal Boaz a taste of his own medicine!  Only don’t complain if he puts a laxative in your coffee when he gets a chance!”

 

III.  SETTING TRAPS


            Hannah spent two weeks in the dental laboratory of an old acquaintance.  In due course, Kadmon’s secretary handed me the documents received in respect of Omri Tal’s claim.  To my delight, Boaz Tamir had stepped into my trap. The verbose documents served on us had been prepared with a view to confusing Kadmon. They failed to state a plain ‘case’ as was appropriate for a skirmish with down to earth protagonists like Hannah  and me.  Suppressing a malicious grin, I retired to my office to prepare our response.

             The main object of the Rules of Court was to achieve clarity in pleadings and to combat surprises and sharp practices. To this end, the plaintiff had to file a ‘Statement of Claim’, setting out the facts of his case, the formal ground on which he based his claim (known as the ‘cause of action’) and his ‘prayer’ or, in other words, the remedy for which he applied. The defendant, in turn, was expected to file an equally clear and detailed ‘Defence’.

 Both documents had to spell out full details respecting each point. If, for instance, the victim of a  running down case averred that the driver had been negligent, he had to provide particulars of the negligence alleged by him. If, in his Defence, the driver claimed that the victim had been equally careless, he, too, had to furnish full details.

            If either party’s pleadings failed to meet the mark, the other party was entitled to demand ‘Further and Better Particulars’. The ostensible object of such an application was to force the evasive party to show his hand and to nail him down.  In real life, though, such applications were often utilised  as a  delaying  tactic. In theory, a case could be set down for its  hearing as early as thirty days following the last exchange of pleadings.  That stage, however, was not reached until all relevant particulars and details had been provided.  A request for further particulars could readily buy the  applicant  six weeks of  grace and, if his opponent decided to respond by filing a similar application of his own, the trial would, usually, be delayed by at least three or even four months.

            Boaz’s Statement of Claim left the door wide open for such manoeuvres. In one clause, for instance, he asserted that Solomon Vered had driven his truck in a “reckless manner devoid of any consideration for the safety of others”. Utilising the strict Rules of Court, I asked, first, for details of Solomon’s alleged recklessness and, secondly, demanded to know what measures of safety he should have observed “in consideration of the safety of others”. In another clause, Boaz averred that Solomon had undertaken his last trip for the day in “blatant defiance of the elementary guidelines on driving shifts”. Seeking to get matters straight, I asked ‘my Learned Friend’ to cite the guidelines in point. Boaz, who had anticipated that his high flying rhetoric would drive Abraham Kadmon to a quick and favourable settlement, was going grind his teeth when he encountered our dispassionate reaction.

            It  took me two days to draft my Application for Further and Better Particulars.  The end product comprised 120 queries. I then drafted our Defence,  leaving Boaz ample opportunity to demand further particulars on  our contentions respecting Omri Tal’s own carelessness, technically described as ‘contributory negligence’.  Boaz was certain to bite and, in this way, make room for another six or seven weeks of delay. Once these  skirmishes were over, the  courts would be getting ready for their summer recess. The case would, obviously,  have to be set down for trial in the next session.

            As was common in those days, my initial drafts had been illegible scribbles. My immediate task was to transform them for submission. In an era in which word-processors were still the subject of science fiction and in  which only senior executives were equipped with dictating machines, the exercise required skill, patience and stamina. My first step was to transcribe my untidy notes into neat pages written in as clear a handwriting as I  could command. It took one of our secretaries three days to type them.

            Two days after Hannah returned to the office from her spell in the dental laboratory, we had our strategy meeting with Jacob Keren. Having regard to the nature of case, there was no need for the ceremony. Hannah was  an experienced court room gladiator, and I could be trusted to lay the legal foundations soundly and carefully. Keren, though, reserved to himself the right to say the last word in every matter. His philosophy on this point was, in the ultimate, commendable: he was the head and sole proprietor of Jacob Keren & Associates.  A blemish on its record was bound to stain his own impeccable record. He was not prepared to take such a risk!

             Snug in his opulent leather chair by the huge, neatly kept, desk,  Jacob Keren’s sharp eyes watched the two of us keenly.

“Excellent detective work, Hannah.  Our Omri Tal doesn’t have to stand when  he’s  at work.  He can sit down and still function efficiently.  What a stroke of  good luck to find out that three excellent dental technicians in Tel Aviv do  their work from a wheelchair!”

“Still, his new work technique will slow him down for  a while,” Hannah commented judiciously.

“For a year?”

“A year or two. He’ll get used to the new pattern of work gradually.  Sachs was working again at full speed two years after his spinal injury.”

“And what do you say about the liability?” Keren asked me.

“I  still think it’s about fifty-fifty. Omri could have got a new battery  for his torch before he rode to the club. There are three hardware shops on the way.  But  Vered could have taken the well lit road instead of the  dark and narrow lane; and he knew he was tired!”

“We’ll settle on 50-50 liability for his loss of future earnings.  The problem is our Valentino’s loss of enjoyment of life: his dancing career has come to an abrupt end! That’s our Achilles heel!”

“Surely, we’ll tell him to concentrate on his second hobby – you must have seen Ratosh’s note?” said Hannah.

“I have,” grunted Keren. “And you did the right thing when you followed up the trail. But do you think the information is helpful?”

“Why not?” Hannah tried to sound adamant. “Ratosh says Omri Tal played fifth and fourth board in tournaments of the Emanuel Lasker  Club.  I’ll try to convince our Omri, in cross, that with extra time at hand he can end up as  first board!”

“What do you think, Eli? You play chess. Well, what are Omri’s chances? Ratosh says Omri is good at openings but  freaks out in the middle game. What do you make of this?”

“Excellent memory but poor strategy and initiative. Not the type of chap who rises to first or even second board.”

“So, his prospects at chess are nothing like his record as an amateur dancer!” Keren summed up.

“Perhaps. But you didn’t think too much of his prospects as a dancer in our first meeting,” said Hannah. “What made you change your mind?”

 “The Registrar has assigned the case to Ehood Morag!”

“What a rotten piece of luck,” said Hannah. “So, we start with a  handicap!”

“A two barrelled handicap,” muttered Keren, adding pointedly: “and I gather that you, Eli, aren’t –  in a manner of speaking – one of Morag’s favourites!”

“True,” I admitted.

“I’m told he snaps at you?”

“He does sometimes!”

“Well, Eli”  said Keren, his eyes fixed on a point over my shoulder,  “a good general knows how to profit from a tactical disadvantage.”

“I understand,” I affirmed, taking note of Hannah’s sympathetic glance.

“Then see what you can come up with when he hears this application. You are to handle it.  It’s time you leave your mark!”

“Oh, very well, then,” I said with resignation.

            Keren smiled malevolently: “Good; but now Hannah and I must turn to another matter.  You’ll excuse us!”

 

IV.  JUSTICE EHUD MORAG


            Back in my minuscule office, I took stock of the situation. Having the Omri Tal case assigned to Justice Ehood Morag was an unfortunate development. Although Morag was a fair-minded man and an excellent lawyer, his sympathy was bound to be with the victim of the accident.

            Originally,  Ehood Morag’s liberal orientation had come as surprise to the legal fraternity of Tel Aviv. Prior to his elevation to the Bench, he  had been  one of the leading advocates engaged by insurance companies in road and industrial accident cases.  He was an accomplished cross-examiner.  He had also been renowned for driving a hard bargain when cases were settled before trial.

            When his appointment was announced, insurance companies and industrials firms smirked gleefully.  At  long last, the Bench would be graced by an incumbent who could be trusted to see matters their way. Their jubilation, though, was short lived.  Justice Morag’s philosophy bore no resemblance to the sentiments expressed by him in his years as an advocate. In that earlier role, he owed  a duty to his clients. On the Bench his duty was to do justice.  He  made use of his first-class knowledge of the tight fisted, often unfair, attitude of insurance companies and of industry. He readily thwarted their untoward manoeuvres.  In no time he became the champion of the cause of the little man, whose overworked and often poorly remunerated lawyer was no match for the skilled gladiator engaged by the business world.

            In our case, his sympathy was bound to be with Omri Tal. This was the first handicap Hannah and I would face. The second hurdle, alluded to by Jacob Keren, was of a more personal nature. One of Ehud Morag’s passions in life was dancing. For years he and his charming wife, Varda, held the trophies awarded by the Tel Aviv Classical Dances Society for the Tango and for the Waltz. Eventually, they lost the latter to a younger, more sophisticated, couple. But they clung to the former. Indeed, Morag’s  nickname in the profession was ‘the Tango King’! From all the judges in Tel Aviv, he was the one most likely to feel empathy for Valentino’s mental sufferings when his dancing career came to such an abrupt and untimely end.

            Obviously, Jacob Keren wanted to see Morag off the case.  The oblique instruction given to me was clear. Morag’s weakness was his hot temper and his inability to suffer fools lightly. On two previous occasions, his outbursts in reaction to stupid remarks of advocates were used as grounds for appeals against what were, in reality, well balanced judgments. Sending the cases back for rehearings, the Court of Appeal pointed out that justice had to be both done and seen to be  done. How could a party to a case be expected to believe he had been given a fair hearing, when the judge had ridiculed and abused his legal representative!

            Jacob Keren’s idea was to utilise the tension, which he  knew existed between Morag and myself as lever for getting the case set before another judge. I was to use picador tricks to induce the Judge to charge! It was a daring stratagem, manifesting Keren’s trust in my discretion and tactical ability. But despite the hidden compliment involved, I was not pleased with the task allocated to me. I had developed a great deal of respect for Morag’s  intellectual ability and trusted  his integrity. I had no wish to sour the relationship, which went back to my second year in Law School, beyond repair. At the very same time, I feared to gain a bad mark from Keren for failing to carry out  his  instruction.

            As  I tried to decide how to deal with the Hobson’s choice  fostered  on me,  I let my mind run through my years of interaction with Ehud Morag.  Shortly after his elevation to the Bench, Morag was constituted an Adjunct Lecturer at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In my second year of studies, I had enrolled in his course on the ‘Law of Civil Wrong (Torts)’ and admired the clarity of his lectures and the brilliance of his stimulating and highly  imaginative analysis. Despite his acid tongue, I took his own tutorials in the course and discovered that Ehud Morag appreciated a good argument in class and was willing to consider novel and unorthodox points. In no  time, I became his star student for the year.

            The scene changed in my next year at the University when I enrolled in Morag’s optional course on Commercial Transactions.  He took the course over for just one session to fill a gap created by a resignation of another lecturer. It soon dawned on me that Ehud Morag had no aptitude for the subject.  He read his lectures out perfunctorily and evaded any intricate question raised from the floor. Indeed, my own understanding of some of the topics, gleaned during periods I had spent as a cadet in banks, surpassed my teacher’s.

The sensible reaction would have been to keep silent and to outshine the rest of the class in the examination. But I was a contentious young man and, in addition, chagrined to find that my idol had feet of clay! To give vent to my disappointment, I started to raise confusing points, asked daunting questions and made observations highlighting absurdities in Morag’s ill conceived analysis of the topic. 

            Ehood Morag was a fair man. Notwithstanding my boorish behaviour, I got a high distinction in Commercial Transactions. His Honour, though, had a long memory. When, after two years of articles in Jacob Keren’s firm, I was called to the Bar and started to appear in interlocutory matters,  Ehud Morag gave me a taste of my own medicine. True, he listened attentively to each argument I developed and remained objective in his decisions.  But he gave me a rough time whenever an opportunity presented itself.

            Jacob Keren’s instruction provided a legitimate opportunity to turn the tables again.  One inner voice whispered that I ought to go ahead.  Another, more sober voice, counselled caution. True, Morag’s taunts and jibes were humiliating; but they had remained harmless. The same voice reminded me that Ehud Morag was a fine judge. Why should I damage his  reputation and standing?

             My  chance to test the ground materialised some five weeks later, on an exceptionally hot day in late spring, when our application came up for  hearing.  As soon as Boaz Tamir and I took our appropriate seats on the two sides of the oblong table in the small conference room, Ehud Morag entered through the door leading to his Chambers.  Having nodded politely when we rose to welcome him,  he sat down unceremoniously and mopped the sweat off his brow.

            Morag leafed rapidly through the file in front of him.  Although he was well into his forties, his deportment displayed the vigour of youth. Notwithstanding his massive head, which appeared out of place on his short and stocky torso, he projected the aura of upper-class elegance and self-assurance. 

            When he was done, Morag closed the file and replaced the thick reading glasses he had been using with a pair of sleek, lightly tinted, spectacles.

“Quite a neatly drafted application, Mr Berger,” he observed with a tight smile. “But you do cross all the T’s and dot all the I’s!”

“An old weakness, Your Honour – not easy to shake off!”

“I am not saying it’s a weakness. Still, it has a bearing on the length of your documents.”

“In this regard, my Learned Friend is in the good company of  Emanuel Kant and Karl Marx,” chimed in Boaz.

“No wonder I never finished the first page of The Critique of Pure Reason. Quite a book,” observed the Judge dryly.

“But, surely,” I retorted, trying to sound just as detached as the Judge,  “the object of this first page is to warn off the casual reader!”

            Ehud Morag, who was the Honorary Treasurer of our Philosophical Society of Israel, ground his teeth. Boaz Tamir tried hard to suppress a chuckle. He did, at the same time, give me a wink. Obviously, the first round went to me.

            The next move was up to Ehud Morag. In open court, he would have followed the rules of procedure and asked me to address him in support of my application.  In the less formal ‘camera meeting’ – where we did not wear our gowns – most judges tended to speed up the proceedings. In this spirit, Ehood Morag turned directly to the points that concerned him.

            To start with, he instructed both of us to supply details of the other party’s alleged negligence. When that issue was settled, he turned to the main point of contention.

“Mr. Berger, you request that the plaintiff supply particulars of his other hobbies or interests, if any. Isn’t that  a  fishing expedition? Why should he provide details of his personal life and interests?”

“I agree that a ‘fishing  expedition’  is  improper in an application of this type, your Honour ...”

“Quite,” observed Morag sternly. “Even in cross-examination a person’s private life should not be exposed  more than is absolutely necessary.”

“Of course. But my Learned Friend  has opened the flood gates, if I may use the expression!”

“How?”

“In clause 24(3)(ii) of the Statement of Claim, which deals with the plaintiff’s loss of enjoyment of life, it is averred that ‘dancing constituted the plaintiff's main hobby and interest as well as a major source of pleasure and satisfaction”. Aren’t we then entitled to explore whether his other hobbies or interests will minimise or mitigate that loss?”

“But why should that affect the plaintiff's claim based on the sufferings caused to him by the sudden end to his dancing activities?”

“If your Honour has already decided that no other interest or hobby can mitigate the plaintiff’s loss on this count, our request for further particulars on the points in question ought to be denied!” 

            Stung by Morag’s dismissive tone, I had carried out Keren’s instruction. The angry flush that spread over the Judge’s face and the look in his eyes showed that the barb had gone home! Morag was about to erupt; but just before he did, Boaz Tamir stepped in.

“Perhaps I could clear the matter up. The plaintiff's only other hobby and interest is chess.  He has played fifth and occasionally fourth board of the Emanual Lasker Club in national tournaments.  We are prepared to provide the particulars, although I do not think they have a direct bearing on the count.”

            His words smoothed the stormy waters. Ehud Morag’s face cleared and the fire went out of his eyes. Deliberately, he replaced his glasses again and pushed the documents to the corner of the table. I in turn, bestowed a grateful glance on Boaz, whose expression had remained immobile throughout. If he sensed how  deeply I regretted my antic, he showed no sign of it.

“Dancing and chess: not an ordinary combination, I suspect.” Morag was again his composed self. “I know nothing about chess. What is the Emanuel Lasker Club – something akin to our august Philosophical Society of Israel?”

“In some ways – except that there are far  more chess players than philosophers,” answered Boaz.

“And how would you rate the Emanuel Lasker Club?”

“It’s the best,” affirmed Boaz.

“What then is this 4th and 5th board business all about?”

“Ranking. First Board is top; fifth is the lowest.”

“Is either of you gentlemen a chess player?” asked the Judge, showing a flicker of interest.

“I’m pretty lousy,” I told him openly.

“Ditto,” said Boaz. “My Learned Colleague usually wins six of every ten  games we play!”

“I though it was the other way round,” I said uneasily. “Still, neither of us would be invited to play for the Emanuel Lasker Club. They’d rather arrive short of one player and concede the set.”

“I don’t understand,” said Morag testily.

“If one of us played, a chess columnist might have something to say about the remarkable standard of the fifth player of club,” muttered Boaz.

“I see.” Morag broke into a smile. “So why do you  imply that the plaintiff’s achievements at chess are irrelevant?” he asked Boaz, adding uneasily; “but perhaps we should not touch on this. It has to settled in the trial. Unless you wish to discuss it informally.”

“I do.  Such a discussion is bound to be of  considerable  assistance,” opined Boaz.

“I agree, your Honour.” My words gave the Judge the assurance that our deliberations would be kept out of the official record of the case. A breach of such an undertaking was unthinkable in our tightly knit legal community. A transgressor would become a pariah.

“Very well then. Let’s proceed.”

“The plaintiff’s performance as an amateur dancer was outstanding, Judge,” said Boaz. “As a chess player, he is mediocre!”

“Do you agree with this analysis, Mr Berger?”

“Our investigations confirm my Learned Friend’s statement. Omri Tal is unlikely to rise to second or even third board at the club: he ain’t a chess champion.  Still, many people would be proud to play 4th board! If I may say so, Judge, I’d rather play 4th board in the Emanuel Lasker Club than be acclaimed a dancing champion!”

“Quite a line for somebody who might make an exhibition of himself on the floor!” countered Morag dryly. Boaz Tamir chuckled.  Obviously,  the second round went to the Judge.

 “The matter has to be left for the trial. The Judge will decide the issue in reliance on the ‘objective bystander test’: would a young man like Omri Tal get over his ‘loss’ and enjoy other hobbies. Agreed?”

“Agreed, Judge,” conceded Boaz.

“So, anything respecting the ‘victim’s’ hobbies is relevant. Well then, let us turn back to our session,” said Morag, indicating the off-the-record discussion was at its end. “Unless you have an objection, Mr Tamir, I  propose to grant the application.”

“I have none, Your Honour.”  Boaz reverted to the more formal form of address.  “Still, I should like to reserve the right to serve a similar application. Can I have three weeks?”

“Mr Berger?” asked the Judge.

“I have no objection, Your Honour.”

“Very well then. But, before we adjourn, I should like to ask why this case has not been settled. The liability issue, for instance, speaks for itself. Have the parties discussed it?”

“We negotiated with the insurers, but reached no agreement,” explained Boaz.

“May I ask the parties to have a further go? Even if no agreement is reached as regards the amount, a consensus on  the  liability issue is bound to save a great deal of time.”

“May we have Your Honour’s tentative views on this issue?” I asked with some hesitation. “Copies of the main depositions are attached to the pleadings.”

“Off the record?” Morag asked after a pause.

“Of course,” said Boaz and I in unison.

“Fifty-fifty as a starting point. What do you say, Tamir?”

“I agree, subject to a variation of 10 per cent either way depending on the outcome of the cross.”

“Berger?” asked the Judge.

“Quite.”

“So why not use 50-50 as a base for apportioning liability?”  Morag trod carefully.  “From the documents available to me at this stage, I cannot form any impression about the damages due under the different counts. Perhaps you could consider these as well?”

“We’ll sure try, Judge” affirmed Boaz.

“Can we then fix a date for the hearing – just in case you get stymied?” suggested Morag.

“There may be a need for further applications, Your Honour,” I said apprehensively.

“Depending on the ‘better particulars’?” asked Morag.

“Yes, Your Honour!”

“But in that case, we shall be unable to fix a date before the June  break.” Morag spoke testily.

“Also, Your Honour,” stepped in Boaz. “I appear with Israel Silver in a major industrial accident case, which has been set for the last week of this term.”

            For a few minutes Morag was lost in his thoughts. When, at long last, he spoke, he let his disappointment show: “When the Registrar referred the case to me, we both thought it could be tried either before the break or at the very beginning of the next  term.  It  now appears we were unduly optimistic. May I suggest that, if the parties wish to take any further procedural steps, they discuss them amongst themselves. Where each party agrees to the requests of the other, there is no need to revert to the Court. I’ll schedule the case for a pre-trial hearing in chambers in the second week of the next term. I shall be away during  the first week.”

“Very well, your Honour,” said Boaz. I, in turn, nodded.

 

 V.  MY FRIENDSHIP WITH BOAZ


            As we walked out, Boaz heaved a sigh of relief. “Ehud Morag gives me a headache. He has a knack of complicating simple points!”

“Don’t you think his analysis of our case is  right? Isn’t Morag brilliant?”

“He is; but only in a narrow field,” conceded Boaz. “But he is unbending and makes no allowances once he steers a course. Judges like him forget they deal with  human problems: not with philosophical arguments!”

“I don’t think he is narrow,” I muttered.

“The way you step up to his defence after doing your best to put him down! You do admire him, don’t you?”

“I suppose I do.”

“How about his rotten performance in his commercial law course. You  showed him up there!”

“It ain’t his field, Boaz!”

“That’s what I am getting at. A man with his ability should have spent some time in the library and prepared a decent series of lectures. He is up to it!”

“Of course he is.  His commercial law course was disappointing. Perhaps he was too busy?”

“No, Eli, he was too bloody arrogant. It’s the same in his other activities. Take his interest in philosophy: he has read every scrap of paper written by writers he likes. But he ‘can’t be bothered’ to  read Kant. I’m told it’s the same in the dancing club. He sticks to Waltz and Tango, which he says are civilised. You won’t get him to try a Polka. Sheer arrogance and narrow mindedness!”

“Oh well,we’ll have to agree to disagree,” I gave in, knowing in my heart of hearts that Boaz was a better judge of human nature than myself.

             Soon we reached the small lane leading to David Mizrachi’s eatery. “Are you free for lunch?” I asked Boaz. Noting the change in his expression,  I added in haste: “It’s a treat – Keren gave a bonus to all of us.”

 Boaz and I relished the succulent Shashlik and Kebabs, the marinated eggplants and the Pitas dipped into the delicious Humus.  As we kept indulging in small talk, I recalled our days at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.  Despite his shock of black hair, his broad shoulders and his  tall figure,  Boaz was too heavy set to be considered good looking. All the same, women were fascinated by the twinkle in his eye, by his easy going manner, by his confident airs and by his carefree demeanour. Many of us felt envy as he appeared, on many an evening, walking down fashionable King George Street with his arm around one attractive girl or another. All of them, though, turned out to be temporary companions. Boaz had his fun, showed his appreciation but preserved his freedom and independence.

            After he graduated, Boaz Tamir left Jerusalem and joined Israel Silver’s renowned law firm in Tel Aviv.  One morning, I received an invitation to his wedding. The lucky girl was Miriam Dagan, a relief teacher who spent a term in a left-wing secondary school in Tel Aviv on secondment from Kibbutz Yokneam.

When I saw her, I opened my eyes wide. The bride was not the type of easy going, light hearted,  glamour girl we used to associate with the lady’s killer of Jerusalem.  She struck me as a caring, self assured, dependable and warm hearted woman, whose beauty lay in her character and outlook on life.  Her plain looks did not detract from the impact left by her personality and by her warm, dark brown, eyes.

“So you are Eli,” she said when I called on them a few weeks after their wedding. “Boaz never stops talking about your days in Jerusalem.”

“Hopefully he told you only good things, Miriam,” I said lamely.

“Please, call me Miri – all my friends do. And I’m sure there are only good things to tell,” she answered with a smile that transformed her face.

“I hope I’ll live up to your expectations,” I said, starting to feel at home.  

            Miri had prepared an excellent meal. In response to my compliments she revealed how she had picked the art up from her mother. Long before the family migrated to Palestine, Mrs. Dagan (Kornfeld in those days) had run a table d'hote in Prague. It was only natural that she was put in charge of her Kibbutz’s communal kitchen and dining room, with a small staff under her command. Over the years, she passed her culinary skills on to her eager daughter, teaching her also how to put any available foodstuffs to their best use. The meal we enjoyed that evening proved that Miri had been a good pupil. The stuffed cabbage rolls, served with a tangy tomato sauce,  the mixed vegetables and the potatoes with parsley were delicious. Unable to resist, I accepted two extra  helpings. Miri’s  eyes  danced  with merriment.

            Then, to my dismay, I felt the first wheeze and the asthmatic’s dreaded sense of choking. Trying awkwardly to conceal my inhaler in my palm, I took two puffs and, to my relief, found that the tight discomfort  in  my chest was abating.

“How long have you suffered from it?” asked Miri. Boaz, who knew I was reticent on the subject, looked at me with unease. Miri’s directness,  though, had disarmed me.

“Since I was a boy of 4 or 5, Miri. It started after a bout of pneumonia I got when we were refugees in France.”

“I had asthma when I was a child,” she volunteered. “I grew out of it in my teens. And you, Eli, should not take things that can bring it on, like sweet wine. There’s nothing to be  embarrassed  about: you can be sure people understand.”  Discreet Boaz looked at her reproachfully. I, though, was not offended:  Miri had spoken sincerely and her words made sense. Smiling at both of them, I thought to myself that Fortuna had been at her gracious best when she brought  Boaz and Miri together.

During the next two years I spent many a happy evening in their comfortable flat in North Tel Aviv, with its pleasant glimpses of the Yarkon river. Boaz was rising fast in Israel Silver’s office and Miri coped well  with  her two careers: the meticulous housewife and the model schoolteacher.  To the regret of all their friends, the atmosphere of solid well being changed thereafter.  Miri, who was a few years older than Boaz and who was  concerned about her maternal age, decided to start a family. For a while Boaz resisted: he was blissfully happy with her and satisfied with his career. He craved for no permutation. In the end, though, he gave way.

            Miri had a difficult pregnancy. The worried look that often crept over Boaz’s face was a source of concern to all his friends. Fortunately,  he did not allow his personal problems to affect his work.  On occasions, though,  he appeared close to breaking point. As time went on, calling on them became an ordeal. Miri continued to shower her hospitality when a guest turned up. To our dismay, she often rushed down the three flights of stairs leading to their flat to get some sweetmeats or soft drinks from the grocer on the corner. Like other friends, I concluded it was best to keep away for a while.

            Matters  took a turn for the better when little Ruthi  arrived.  Leaving the dining room at the Kibbutz in charge of her second in command,  Miri’s mother came down to Tel Aviv to help her daughter out. Miri recovered in no time and was again able to welcome guests with the ease of earlier days.  Once again, many of us flocked to their home.  This happy state was not disrupted by Miri’s second pregnancy which went well. Unfortunately, she took things too lightly, carrying on her full-time job until, one sad morning, she had to be rushed to hospital. To everyone’s relief, the episode ended without a tragedy: Miri recovered after a few weeks. But baby Benjamin,  who had arrived prematurely, remained undersize and sickly. After a number of heavy head and chest cold, he  had his first attack of  asthma.  Despite the favourable diagnosis of two paediatricians and the care lavished on him by his parents, he was unable to shake it off.

            Benjamin's condition led to a  turning point in the  Tamir’s fortunes.  Determined to nurse her son back to health, Miri resigned her job and, before long, the loss of her salary triggered financial problems. Eventually,  their house loan fell into arrears. Although the bank agreed to reinstate it and to extend the repayment period, the interest rate applied to the new package was considerably higher than that charged originally. In consequence, the reduction of the monthly instalments was smaller than the Tamirs had anticipated. Occasionally, Miri was able to help keep their heads above water by giving private tuition. But more often than not, they were short of cash.

             Thoughts of the problems faced by the Tamirs kept roving through my mind during the sumptuous repast in David Mizrachi’s eatery. I was, further, reflecting on the strong friendship that bound me to the Tamirs on the individual level but, at the very same time, did not stop me from resorting to every legitimate trick when Boaz and I were pitched against one another professionally.  I knew that Jacob Keren had a similar relationship with his two arch rivals. To function properly within the rules: all of us had to drive a wedge between the personal and the professional worlds in which we existed. Those who lost sight, or who confused the issues, usually came to grief.

“A penny for your thoughts, Eli,” I heard Boaz chuckle.

“Our life philosophy: the lawyer’s need to separate the personal from the professional. Is it wholesome?”

“You mean: is it sensible?”

“I had rather ask:  isn’t it perverse?”

“I don’t think it is,” said Boaz after a reflective pause. “When you handle a case, or negotiate a deal, you act for your client: you look after his interests. You can’t allow your friendship for the other party or his representative to interfere. But once that matter is settled, we function as individuals.  The client’s dealings must not be allowed to affect us on that plane.”

“I  suppose you are right. But  sometimes  the boundaries get obliterated!”

“Quite,” agreed Boaz dryly. “Like when you use someone else’s style and standard letters as a camouflage!”

“You think that’s going too far?” I asked, mortified.

“Borderline,” Boaz comforted me. “But pinching your friend’s notes just before he gets up for his opening is a different matter altogether!”

“I can’t imagine any one of us stooping that low!”

“I am told it has happened.”

For a while we gossiped about old friends and new acquaintances. Then, at long last, I assumed the courage to ask about Miri and Benjamin.

“Miri's OK, Eli. But Benji is no better. Sometimes I wish Miri didn’t drag him from one doctor to another. The bills accumulate but the medicines do him no good – no good at all.”

“You ought to put a stop to it, Boaz. I’ve been through it when I was a boy. Usually, these specialists are just a bunch of sharks – sharks and quacks!”

“Why don’t you tell Miri when you come over next? And, coming to think of it, we haven’t seen you for some time.”

“I’ve been shuttling between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.  Some legal points turn on the Turkish Land Law. Some materials are available only in Jerusalem.”

            As we were getting ready to leave, Boaz reverted to the Omri Tal matter.  “Eli, we should really spend some time on the liability issue. Is fifty-fifty agreeable?”

“I’m pretty sure it is. I’ll have to check with Hannah; but I see no problem. Off the record, it’s the very figure she had in mind.”

“Shall I drop you a line to this effect?” asked Boaz.

“Please do. I’m quite certain we won’t haggle on this point. The actual sum is something different!”

“Very well,” said Boaz, taking hold of his briefcase.

“But before we go, Boaz, thanks for saving the situation in Morag’s chambers.”

“Don’t mention it, Eli. And you must not let Jacob Keren put you up to such ruses. It’s one thing to parry with a chap like Morag. I suspect he enjoys it if he gives as good as he takes. Tricking him into an outburst with a view to getting him off a case is a different matter altogether: he would have never forgiven you.”

“Did he know what I was up to?”

“Hard to tell. If he was, he also knew Keren was behind it. In any event,  you handled him well later on. So the episode is closed. But don’t you ever again let Keren use you as a pawn! I suppose he’d express regrets if you came to grief. But he won’t lift a finger to help! A chap like him never does!”

“Are they all like that, Boaz?”

“Some may be smoother – less obvious. But they are of the same mould. It’s a harsh world, Eli!”

“Are we, too, going to end up like them?” I asked after a pause.

“I fear we may. It’s the price of success at our game. All leading lawyer have worked their ways up through the ranks. They had their own ideals as young men and, even today, observe legal  ethics and the norms of honesty and good behaviour.  We must concede that they are honourable and righteous men! Still, they have taught themselves to play hard and fast within the accepted parameters.  As long as they ‘act lawfully’, they are  not  pricked by conscience or bothered by any consideration for others!”  

“And we too may end up like them,” I said sadly. “After all, even now we enjoy the games we play in court and out of it.”

“Quite. And see you soon in our place.  Ruthi has been clamouring for her Uncle Eli. But please don’t bring her chocolates.  She breaks into a rash the next morning!”

 

VI.  HANNAH’S DECISION TO CHANGE JOBS

 

A few days passed before I managed to track Hannah down. After weeks of a major courtroom battle, she took one week of leave. When she reappeared,  I stared at her with concern. Once again she had lost weight, looked worn out and a dry cough and persistent wheeze marred her speech.

“You need a real break, Hannah. “And you ought to spend a few days in Eilat. A change of climate can do wonders.”

“Next week I’m taking Tali to Tiberias. I’ll be away for two or three weeks.”

“Give me a tinkle  if you need anything,” I offered.

“I  shan’t need a thing. I’m going to leave the office behind!”

“Good on you!” I approbated. “In the words of Goethe: ‘it [the office]  can lick… ”.

“Now, now, Eli,” Hannah burst into a fit laughter interrupted by a cough, “poetic licence is prohibited in all respectable law firms! And  we better  spend  a few minutes on the Omri Tal case. I read your memo.  So you think Morag will do?”

“I’m positive.”

“Very well then. And, Eli, I’m glad you didn’t follow up Jacob Keren’s hint. I wanted to warn you off but got too entangled in my recent case.  I didn’t have the chance to talk to you.”

“Still, don’t we have to go back to Keren?”

“No! We won’t! I'll take the responsibility! And, Eli, for all practical purposes you are in charge. As soon as I’m back, Jacob Keren and I have to get ready for the next phase of our major case.”

“What if Keren raises the Omri Tal matter with me when you are away?”

“He won’t. Malka is taking him for a holiday in Cyprus. They leave tomorrow. And if he feels up to it, she proposes to book a cruise to the Greek Islands. He, too, will be away for a few weeks.”

“Is Keren in a bad way?” I asked. “I thought he took court cases in his stride.”

“He isn’t getting younger! And this is a particularly tricky matter.” 

“Well Hannah, don’t let him drag you into cases like that.”

            “Actually, Eli, I’m going to do better than that!”

“How?”

“I’m quitting!”

“Quitting?"”

“Yes, Eli. I can’t go on like this! And it’s not just my health!”

“What else?”

“The other day I came home just before midnight. Tali was all worked up. She wanted to know if I had an affair with Jacob Keren!”

“I hope you gave her a good hiding!”

“No, Eli. That would have been counter-productive. I simply told her what Keren and I had been working on – step by step. Before long she broke into tears, hugged me and said she’d quit school and get a job so that I could have a decent rest. And she warmed up the dinner she had made for us and insisted I eat; and it was delicious!”

“But what has all this got to do with your job here?”

“A teenaged girl like Tali needs her mother. I’ve neglected her long enough! As things stand, I’m never at home before 8.00pm. It ain’t right!”

“But do you have another job?”

“As a matter of fact, I do. Rotem is setting up a Legal Department. It’ll take charge of lending contracts, mortgage registrations, debt collections and run of the mill litigation.  Ruth Schwartz offered me the job.  It’s  not as glamorous as doing big cases with Keren. But the salary is OK, and it’s a 9.00am to 5.00pm desk job, just what I want. And Keren can look for some other aspiring lawyer to take my place! I’m tired of the limelight!”

“I can see your point, Hannah. I only hope I shan’t be Keren’s next victim!”

Hannah broke into a smile. “You need not fear. Keren knows your strength is working out complex legal points. He prefers to work with somebody who is strong on facts and practicalities.”

“That leaves me out.”

“It does. So don’t worry!”

“Well, how about the Omri Tal case? Keren won’t let me handle a full trial for at least another year or two.  Will you be able to appear?”

“I think so. Rotem expects me to take up court cases from time to time. So even if  the case is heard after I leave, I’ll be able to take it on by arrangement.”

 

                                     VII.  PRE TRIAL MANOUVERINGS

 

            During the following weeks, Boaz and I kept exchanging procedural broadsides.  Each clever move cancelled out another, which meant that we produced more heat than light. The proceedings, though, did not disrupt our friendship. During the very same period, I came over regularly to the Tamirs’ residence, usually bringing with me a bottle of wine or, as was  the custom in Israel, fresh fruit for their table. Invariably, we had  a pleasant time, playing after dinner a game of Monopoly, listening to music, or discussing fervently some political events or newly published books. The only subject we stayed clear off  was the Omri Tal trial.

            I  recall one evening, when Miri prepared a sumptuous  meal. Noting my apprehensive look, she smiled at me warmly: “No, Eli, I’m not being extravagant. We have just received a letter from America.  My Aunt Lilly passed away a few weeks ago. She left us some 35,000 dollars!”

“That’s wonderful,” I said.

“Let’s hope Auntie Lilly’s spirit agrees with you,” observed Boaz dryly. “Still, we are now able to repay our mortgage in full!”

“But don’t you want to take a trip to Europe or America first?” I asked.

“Sooner or later we shall. We’ll start saving for it straight away. But first I want to tell our bank manager to go jump!”

            A few days later the Tamirs went for a fortnight to Kibbutz Yokneam. I, in turn, proceeded to Mount Karmel, then a sparsely populated and unspoiled haven. Leaving the office and my work behind me, I went for long walks in the brisk mountain air which, even during the Mediterranean summer, retained its cool and dry touch. I returned to Tel Aviv revitalised, ready for the  start of the new Judicial Session.

As I prepared myself for the  hearing before Ehood Morag, I sensed that all procedural antics had been exhausted. Unfortunately, a discreet report of Joseph Almog,  a  well  known  private investigator, affirmed that, up to then, young Omri Tal had not put in an appearance in his beloved dancing club. I was raking my brain for a good excuse for a further adjournment, when I got an unexpected telephone call from Miri Tamir.

“Eli,” she said in her direct manner. “Boaz asked me to ring you about the appearance before Judge Morag next Monday.”

“Is anything wrong?”

“Not really. We are all fine, but Boaz was called up for reservist service! He had to leave yesterday!”

“Didn’t they give him some notice?”

“They said they sent him a summons, but we never got it. They probably sent it to the wrong address. When he didn’t respond, they came over to take him!”

“Just like that?” I let my annoyance show.

“Just like that, and they were rude. Still, he’s an officer, so, in the end, they had to behave themselves. But Boaz had to go; and he won’t  be  back for six weeks!”

“What is to be done?”

“Nobody in the office wants to take the case over. Boaz wants you to explain the position to the Judge.”

“It’s unusual, Miri. Still, Morag knows both of us  well.  So I’m pretty sure he’ll understand.”

“That’s what Boaz said,” she replied.

“I’ll ring you as soon as I have appeared before Morag.  In the meantime, please give my best wishes to Boaz.”

             Ehud  Morag’s associate led me to the Judge’s Chambers as soon as I arrived but, to my surprise, did not stay put. As I was being heard in the absence of the ‘other party’ this was unusual. Noting my surprise, Morag explained the position readily.

“In view of what I have got to say, we can skip all formalities, Berger.  But, first, how was your break?”

“Good, Judge. I had a pleasant time up Mount Karmel. I love it there.”

“Hopefully, your haven will not be discovered too soon by tourists,” he said with a smile. Looking at him more closely, I concluded that he, too, had had a relaxing  holiday.  All the same, he did not appear particularly  ebullient. Indeed, I had the impression he was ill at ease.

“Boaz Tamir asked me to apologise to you for this irregularity, Judge.  Regrettably, the army did not give him any warning. He was called up suddenly, and he’ll be away for six weeks.”

“I understand. The army says the safety of the homeland constitutes a first priority. In their eyes, our timetables are irrelevant. Unfortunately, Tamir’s ‘abduction’ means  that I shan’t be able to hear the case.”

“Why, Sir” I said, correcting myself instantly, “I mean, Judge.”

“The Frumm Factory explosion case is coming up in five weeks and I have been asked to take it on. I expect it to last at least four months. Your case should not be in abeyance for such a span.  It would have to be heard by another judge, probably Baruch Shoham. I hope Tamir and you will appear before me in another matter in the future. I like to watch my former students in action.”

             Boaz Tamir, to whom I conveyed the information through Miri, expressed his unequivocal approval. “Boaz,” Miri informed me, “says he prefers Shoham’s common sense to Morag’s brilliant but often fancy  analysis.”

Hannah, too, voiced her relief. “I always know where I stand with Shoham. Morag is mercurial! I know he is very clever. But I’d rather have a down to earth judge than an intellectual giant!”

A few days later Hannah told me the major case, handled by Keren and herself, had been settled. “A sudden breakthrough?” I asked.

“Not really. They could have settled on the same terms from the word go. But all involved had to exhaust themselves before they were prepared to come to the conference table in a mood to compromise!”

“And the lawyers made a handsome profit. Still, the settlement lets you off the hook earlier than expected.”

“It does. And Keren has already found a suitable replacement.”

“Who?”

“Rachel  Zeitlin. She has ditched her second husband and feels Jerusalem is too small a place for the two of them!” 

“So, we’ll have the honour of seeing her in Tel Aviv,” I grunted.

“And you better watch out,” Hannah confided, maternally. “Rachel is sure to look for her number three!”

“You better introduce her to Abraham Kadmon. The  poor chap had a bad shock when his wife ran away with that taxi driver. A liaison with a hot shot lawyer like Rachel will boost his shaken ego.”

“I’ll do my best,” Hannah giggled. “But I have it on good authority that Rachel is looking for a nice, young and innocent bloke!”

“That leaves me out!” I asserted.

“Glad to have allayed your fears. We better turn our undivided attention to Omri Tal! I remain on the case. And, Eli, have a look at Almog’s latest report: Valentino is back on the dancing floor but restricts himself to Waltz and Tango.”

“Does this help our cause?” I asked, skimming through the document. “The chap was a virtuoso. Some social dancing is neither here nor there!”

“True! But where there’s life there’s hope.  Before long, Omri will start afresh!”

“But surely,” I persevered, “there is a difference between social dancing and Omri Tal’s original aspirations to fame?”

“There is. But the orthopaedic surgeons did not rule out rehabilitation. So, perhaps, we can demand a further medical examination?”

“I’ll raise the matter in the pre-trial session. If the case is really assigned to Shoham, we’ll get an order.”

“Very likely. In the meantime, we better keep Omri Tal ‘under observation’. But, Eli, we need time!”

“I'll see what I can do. But I’m running out of gimmicks!”

“Play it by ear, then” she suggested.

             In the event, Fortuna smiled on us. Some ten days before Boaz’s discharge from reservist service, Miri called again. “Eli, Boaz asked me to tell you he needs a further extension.”

“Don’t tell me they’re keeping him for some extra time?”

“No, that’s not the reason”, her voice shook as spoke.

“What is wrong? I hope nothing happened to him.”

“He is sick, Eli. He’s got hepatitis! He is in hospital.”

“Jaundice?” I asked anxiously. “I’ve never known Boaz to be sick, Miri, except of course a cold or soar throat here and there. What happened?”

“Two of his men took him for a meal in Ramleh. You know he loves Arab food. I suspect the plates had not been properly rinsed.”

“Can I visit him?”

“He’ll be hospitalised for two weeks. You can come over when I bring him home. But you better be careful, it’s very contagious. I’m sending the kids to Yokneam. Mom will look after them until Boaz  recovers.”

“Let me know how he is doing and when he is likely to be back at work? The judge may ask.”

“It’ll take him six weeks to recover and he’ll have to rest at home for another two or three weeks.”

“I’ll ask for a two months adjournment.” 

 Judge  Shoham’s associate secured the required adjournment straight away. During the next two months, Hannah kept getting detailed reports from Joseph Almog, our PI. He confirmed that Omri and his ‘charming  Dahlia’ were attending two, occasionally three, social dancing sessions in their club each week.  In later reports, Almog, who had gained Omri’s confidence, confirmed that Omri was again keeping normal working hours in his workshop.  Later still, Omri had confided he was ‘fed up with the stuck up society of Tel Aviv’ and planned to move to Be’er Sheva in the Negev. In due course, Omri and Dahlia put down a deposit on a three-bedroom house in a fashionable suburb of their chosen town. They planned to get married as soon as they moved down South. Almog had been invited to attend their engagement party.

“So you see,  Eli,” Hannah smirked with satisfaction.  “Young Valentino’s positive outlook on life is standing him in good stead. I bet that as soon as Mr & Mrs Tal settle in Be’er Sheva, they’ll start a dancing club!”

           Boaz took longer than anticipated to recover. Like most vigorous and self assured men, he was a difficult patient, given to petulant outbursts followed by spells of remorse, melancholy and depression. Their effect on Miri was devastating.  Occasionally, I felt more concerned for her than for the invalid she was painstakingly nursing back to health.

            In  an attempt to alleviate their burden, I came over to their place as often as work permitted. Because alcohol and fruit had been proscribed by the doctor, I brought Boaz books, magazines and, from time to time,  reports of new legal decisions. Boaz was a voracious reader and, over the seven weeks he remained bedridden,  got  immersed in some philosophic tracts as well as in modern novels.

            Reading, though, did not keep Boaz fully occupied. Every now and then he rang up his secretary to get the latest office news and, whenever I turned up, cross-examined me on what was going on  in our small and closely knit legal fraternity. After a while it dawned on me that I was not his only source of information. One evening, for instance, he asked whether Hannah had already taken up her new post at Rotem.

“She has. We gave her a splendid farewell party. Keren used the occasion to deliver a moving speech!”

“Praising Hannah’s performance?”

“That too. But his main theme was the virtue of steady work and  perseverance.”

“Was Keren by any chance trying to impress Rachel Zeitlin? I’m told  she has taken over from Hannah!”

“You do keep your ear to the ground.”

 “I am allowed to tap the grapevine – even although drinking is  prohibited for the time being.  And, Eli, I hope you’ll come to like Rachel.  She’s exciting and – let me tell you – a nice girl!”

“Nice? How about her two divorces?”

“I’m not suggesting she’s suitable for a lasting relationship. She is self-centred and can be quite a handful. But an evening with her is fun!”

“I’ll convey the information to Abraham Kadmon. We are making a concentrated effort to bring the two lost souls together!”

“Don’t be silly. Kadmon is too old for her. And he is a non-entity. Rachel will have a fit if he dares to ask her out.”

“So why do you wish her Ladyship on poor me?”

“Because you, Eli, must not go on pining for the girl who said ‘no’ to you ages ago!”

“I’ll look around when pressure eases at work!”

“Balderdash. You use every spare moment to dash over to the Philosophic Society. You better take stock of the situation or you’ll end up a confirmed bachelor with beautiful dreams behind you!”

 

                                                VIII.   JUSTICE BARUCH SHOHAM

  

            When Boaz returned to work, winter was just around the corner.  Our pre-trial hearing with Baruch Shoham took place on a wet and chilly day.  Unlike the sparkling conference table in Morag’s ante chamber, Shoham’s plain table was covered with  books, untidily strewn files and proofs of articles to be published in The  Advocate, which he edited for our Law Society.   As we entered, he raised his eyes from the document in front of him and beckoned us to sit down.

“I'm glad you are well again, Mr. Tamir,” he said warmly.  “I was extremely sorry to hear about your ailment.  Hepatitis is a nasty thing!”

“It is indeed, Judge,” affirmed Boaz.

“My wife had it shortly after we fled from Germany.  She was down for some eight weeks! I hope medicine has made some progress since then!”

“I suppose it has.  But, even so, it took me seven weeks to get over it!”

“Still, all’s well that ends well.  I hope you will stick to the diet prescribed by your doctor.  We must never take chances with our health!  You do agree, don’t you?”

“Of course,” said Boaz, smiling gratefully.

             During this brief exchange, and the next few minutes in which Shoham gathered his thoughts as he leafed through the file, my eyes moved keenly between the two men. Boaz would have resented the very same sentiments if expressed  by another person in authority, such a Ehud Morag.  Inwardly, he would have dubbed the speaker a patronising ass.  The warm smile which had crept over his face when he answered Shoham, convinced me that no such thought had crossed his mind on this occasion.

            Grinning to myself, I concluded that, like many Yekkes, Baruch Shoham had a way with people.  Despite his beaked nose, inordinately long ears, bald head and nondescript countenance, he was liked and respected by everyone who worked with him.  His associate doted on him and his secretary stayed behind for long hours to finish her work without expecting overtime pay.  Most lawyers in Tel Aviv were delighted  when their cases were set down before him.  I recalled with amusement how, at the end one of his customary tirades against the ‘bloody Yekkes’, Keren added, “thank  goodness there are some exceptions, like Baruch Shoham.”

            In more than one way, this general esteem was surprising.  To start with, Baruch Shoham was a stickler to the rules. Unlike other judges, who would occasionally use shortcuts in order to expedite hearings, Shoham believed in leaving no procedural or substantive issue unresolved.  Occasionally, this was both unnecessary and pedantic.  His pleasant manner alone saved him from critical comments.

            The other handicap that Baruch Shoham had to overcome in order to gain the respect of the young but vigorous Israeli Bar related to his legal background.  Shortly after the end of the First World War, Markus Edelstein – as he was then known – studied law and economics in Heidelberg.  After two years in Berlin, he moved to Darmstadt and started to practise on his own.  His business flourished but, reading the writing on the wall, he sold out in 1936 and migrated to Palestine.  After years of pupillage and studies, he was called to the  local Bar.  By then he had acquired a sound, even if rather basic, understanding of the English common law which had been engrafted onto the Turkish Law of Palestine.  The general consensus was that, notwithstanding his alien credentials, Baruch Shoham functioned efficiently in this complex legal environment.   At heart, though, he remained a civilian lawyer.  In his own words: “Policy must emerge from general principles.  To ascertain it from an amorphous mass of rigidly construed decisions and piecemeal determinations is unscientific and unsound!”

            Ordinarily, such pronouncements would have antagonised the luminaries of the  local profession, most of whom had qualified after studies for the English Bar qualification.  What saved Baruch Shoham from their censure was his masterful handling of all cases tried by him.  Even where matters were complex and the subject of conflicting evidence, his analysis of the facts remained superb.  No detail in any document, deposition, expert’s report or testimony escaped his attention.  And his ability to get to the heart of the matter was phenomenal.  It was, generally, thought that this flair made up for certain shortcomings in his analysis of fine points of law.

             When Shoham raised his eyes from the Omri Tal file, he smiled warmly at both of us. “I don’t think you left any point uncovered, Gentlemen. And I am relieved to note that the parties have agreed on a fifty-fifty apportionment of  liability.  We’ll save at least one morning this way.  But may I make one suggestion?”

“Please, Judge” said Boaz.

“Well, both of you have been meticulous in asking for and providing ‘further particulars’.  I am, of course, all in favour, the issues have crystallises and we’ll have no surprises during the trial.  But I think it would be for the best if all the additional details were incorporated in a single of amended pleadings.  This way we shall not have to rove from document to document as we go.  What do you say?”

“The thought has crossed our minds,” Boaz volunteered. “We were going to raise it with you.”

“Splendid. Will two weeks do? You can always come back to me if you are unable to meet the deadline.”

“What do you think, Eli” asked Boaz.

“It’s fine with me.”

“Good,” said Shoham. “The next point I want to raise concerns the reports of the two orthopaedic  surgeons.  Both conclude that the  plaintiff’s  progress ought to be monitored.  Although the ‘extent of the injury’ is determined as at the time of the accident, the reports confirm that, in our case, the extent of the injuries  sustained can be assessed only after a review of the healing process, which varies from person to person.  Well, what do you say?”

“Again, Judge, Eli and I are of the same view.  But we have a practical  problem.  The two surgeons who provided the reports are no longer available.  Ours migrated to Canada and Rotem’s man retired for reasons of health.  We are trying to find another surgeon, acceptable to both parties. But the three we’ve approached turned us down flat!”

“Have you tried Dr. Alon Shaked?”

“He was our first choice,” said Boaz.

“His receptionist was rather curt!” I grumbled.

“We may get a different response if I ask Alon Shaked to act as ‘Court’s Expert’.  This way he’ll be cross examined only if his report gives rise to controversy.  Well, shall I ask my associate to approach him?”

Boaz was supportive.  “Please do, Judge.  Do you think it might, perhaps, be possible to prevail on Dr.  Shaked  to submit his report in eight copies?”

“That,” said Shoham sadly, “might be the last straw! I suspect many surgeons and physicians refuse to assist us because they hate to get their reports typed, proof read and retyped.  But I have another suggestion.  A few days ago a new photographic shop opened up in Herzl Street.  They use a very modern method.  You can  get any number of prints within 24 hours.  The price is somewhat higher than we are used to but, then, you have to pay for progress.  Do you think this will do?”

“I’m sure it will,” I stepped in. “If, perhaps, your associate could ring me when you get the report, I’ll take it to the shop. I’m sure our clients will  be prepared to defray the expenses subject to the order of costs to be made subsequently.”

“That’s fine with me,” agreed Boaz gratefully.

“Splendid.  And, Gentlemen, you will be interested to know that, before long, problems concerning the  production of copies of documents will become a thing of the past!  Copies will be produced readily on the premises of every law office  and commercial firm!”

“How?” I wanted to know.

“According to an American magazine, a new photographic technology will be announced soon.  It will enable us to make a copy of a typed or written page by feeding it through the ‘camera’, without first producing a  ‘negative’.  The entire procedure will take less than 10 seconds per page!”

“It will revolutionise office practice!” said I.

“It will.  But its introduction will also trigger fresh work for law offices!”

“Why?”

“At present you hand your judge a ‘List of Authorities’ just before the trial begins. He has to read them in the library or get his long-suffering associate to haul the books to his Chambers. How long will it take before judges demand that law offices ‘reproduce’ all the authorities cited?”

“True,” agreed Boaz. “But that manual work can be done by a secretary!”

“Quite so,” nodded Shoham.  “But her boss will have to check that nothing has been left out!  But, now, we must turn back to the matter presently before us.  Mr Berger, I understand Frau Hod is no longer with your firm.  Are you going to represent Rotem at the trial?”

“Not on this occasion, Judge.  Mr Keren has asked Hannah Hod to carry on with this case.  But I do hope I shall have the pleasure of appearing before you, in Court, on some future occasion.”

“The pleasure will be mine,” smiled Shoham.  “And I shall, of course, be pleased to see Frau Hod in Court this time.   So can we perhaps fix the date?”

“I hope it can be heard soon after we have Dr. Shaked’s report, Judge,” said Boaz.  “My client proposes to move to Be'er Sheva as soon as the hearing is finished.”

“Well, we sure ought to try to accommodate him.  Will a date early in March be suitable?  If the plaintiff sees Alon Shaked next week, we’ll receive the report before the end of this month.”

“The first week of March is fine for us,” said Boaz.

“I’ll have to check with Hannah Hod. But, as far as I know, she has no other trial at that time.  May I suggest we pencil the dates in, subject to my confirming with her?”

“Excellent.  So we are all set. 

 

IX.  BOAZ’S SETBACK

 

            Leaving our briefcases in the “robing room”, Boaz and I walked to Nahalat Benjamin Street.  Ignoring Boaz’s covetous glance in the direction of David Mizrachi’s Eatery, I steered a course to the old fashioned  restaurant which served home cooked Jewish  dishes.  Boaz sighed as he perused the bill of fares but cheered up when the salt beef, boiled chicken, mashed potatoes and a mixed salad were placed in front of us.

“Today it’s on me, Eli” he said.

             For a while both of us concentrated on the excellent food.  Initially, the peace and quiet surrounding us was  comforting but, eventually, I found the silence depressing.

“Boaz, what’s the matter.  It’s not like you to sit here and brood!  Have I offended you somehow?”

“Of course not, Eli.  Don’t be silly.  The little games we play when we practise law are contests of skill.  But there are certain matters on my mind.”

“I hope nothing is wrong ...” I started and stopped dead in my tracks, apprehensive of asking a tactless question.

“No, Eli, nothing’s wrong at home,” Boaz hurried to assure me.  “Now that things are back to normal, Miri is again her good happy self.  And – let me tell you – a few days ago Ruthi got a distinction in school for her essay!”

“So maybe one day she’ll outshine Dad!” I grinned.

“Let’s hope she picks on something better than our bloody profession,” answered Boaz, then hastily covered his mouth with his palm.

“So, something’s wrong at work. Care to tell me?”

For a moment Boaz hesitated.  “You see, Eli, some two weeks ago, just before I was back at work, they had their quarterly partners’ meeting. Well, they constituted me a salaried partner!”

“Congratulations.  That’s excellent news.  So what on earth is wrong?”

“They elected Leah Sapir and that fellow Dror Ergass full equity partners!  I keep telling myself both  have been with the firm longer than me.  But I still can’t understand why they were jumped from associates to full partners in one go!”

“It is unfair.  Both are average.  Dror is also bone lazy!  And Leah is useless, in her two years with Keren, she was nicknamed ‘the mother of all lost cases’!”

 “Well, neither of them has changed for the better over the years.”  Boaz, broke our eye contact and fixed his dejected glance on the plate in front of him.  I, in turn, looked at him with understanding.

            Boaz’ chagrin and my sympathy might have puzzled  an outsider.  Indeed, to anybody except a fellow lawyer, Boaz’ new designation would have sounded grand.  In reality, though, a ‘salaried partner’ was nothing but a well paid associate.  He had no say in the running of the firm, was not entitled to a share in its profits and, unlike an ‘equity partner’, remained an employee.  In a ‘Sole Proprietorship’, such as ‘J Keren & Associates’, such an appointee was known as a ‘Senior Associate’.  His pay was higher than a  mere associate’s.  But the ‘Sole Proprietor’ remained the one and only boss!

“Surely, Boaz, you’ll be made an equity partner next year!  Still, I don’t understand how Israel Silver could do this to you!”

“He didn’t, Eli.  You must remember that, unlike Jacob Keren, Silver is just the Senior or Managing Partner.  The younger partners have the power to outvote him.  This time they did!  They argued it would be safer to consider my case after I’d recovered.  Silver had to give way but wrung out the Salaried Partnership and an undertaking that I would be reviewed again next year!”

“Well, at least he fought for you. And I hope he got you a good salary.”

“He did, rather.  I’ll get as much as Dror and Leah.  And the firm will also pay me a percentage of my billings.  If I pull my weight my ‘take home package’ will be fine.  But there’ll still be the thorn in the flesh, I can’t bear to think these two have been advanced before me.”

“They’ve been with the firm much longer than you.   It’s not as if they had stolen a march.  And perhaps it was their last chance.”

“That what I keep telling myself.  But Dror and Leah trot home by 5.00pm and I stay behind till 9.00 or even 10.30pm.  I’ve worked my guts out for the firm, and just because I’ve crossed swords with some of these bastards, they do a dirty on me when I’m ill in bed!”

“You mustn’t let this get you down . If it does, they’ll have the last laugh!”

“I know.  Thanks, Eli.”

 

            Soon the waitress cleared the table and brought us two cups of steaming, strongly brewed and aromatic coffee.  Seeing that Boaz remained lost in his thoughts, I prompted, “Is there anything else you wanted to tell me?”

“As a matter of fact, there is.  When this Omri Tal case is over, I want to have a chat with you.  If there  is any unexpected development at work, please take it easy.  I have a plan you might find interesting!”

 

X.  PRE TRIAL MEETING

 

            Omri  Tal  saw  Dr. Alon Shaked before the end of the  month.  When  the medical report was in, I convened the firm’s pre-trial ‘conference’, chaired by Jacob Keren in person. Shortly before the appointed hour, Hannah Hod slipped into  my  office. She  looked invigorated, had put on weight and, to my delight, had  taken  the trouble to make herself up.

“And how are you, Eli? I hear you have moved up in the world?”

“Eh?”

“Oh,  I am not suggesting you got a promotion. I am no longer a party to  such little secrets. But I’m told that you have  risen  high  in  the esteem of one Rachel Zeitlin, although she won’t go  to  another dance with you unless and until she finds a pair of steel framed shoes!”   

“I did  tread  on her toes once or twice,” I  admitted  shamefacedly.  “But  I thought that even so she enjoyed the evening?”

“I’m sure she did. But I suspect she prefers to take you to  the opera, the Philharmonic Orchestra, Habimah, cinemas, posh restaurants and let me not guess where else!”

“Hannah!!!”

“Calm down, Eli: my motto is: ‘live and let live’. But, seriously,  you better take care not to cross the point of no return blindfolded!”

“Rachel  and  I have a good working relationship,” I stated lamely. “But  I  do like to go out with her – she is fun.”

“I’m glad you enjoy her company. How do you find her as a lawyer?”

“She  is a fine courtroom advocate.” Indeed, Rachel could be as aggressive a cross-examiner as Hannah but also knew when to pull her punches or opt for a tactical retreat.

“But don’t you have to do some of her thinking for her?”

“She’s not an Ehood Morag on points of law.”

“So, you may complement one another. Well, then,  best of  luck to both of you. But now we better trot over to Jacob Keren’s  office. He won’t appreciate being kept waiting!”

 

“Nice  to see you again, Hannah. And how do you find your new post?” Keren,  I noticed,  looked  at peace with the world. His ruddy  complexion  and  relaxed expression  attested that his spell in the Greek Islands had agreed with him. Just for once, he appeared to be at the top of the world.

“I’m fine, Mr. Keren. And you look splendid. Well, what do you think of our present matter?” Hannah pressed ahead.

“Joseph  Almog’s reports confirm that Valentino is back on the dancing floor. But  dear Omri  restricts himself to social dancing. And Dr. Shaked  thinks this is all he’ll be able to manage for the time being. So  it seems  to me we better to crush his claim for loss of future earnings and  settle the loss of enjoyment of life claim. Omri is getting  married, has  the courage to plan a move to Be’er Sheva and, generally, shows no  signs of  becoming  a  social  pariah or a dejected recluse. I  think  that settlement for  an  amount  of IL18,000.00 sounds reasonable. What do you think, Hannah?”

“I  still  want to tackle him on both counts. I know that our Omri  won’t  win another  Rumba trophy. But Almog’s reports show he continues to enjoy  a  full life: so, isn’t his ‘loss of enjoyment of life’ nominal?”

“Eli?” asked Keren.

“I’m  not  so sure. A man can put a good face on his ‘loss’ but go  on  losing sleep  over  it. Suppose Omri tells us: ‘My big dream was to be  the  greatest Rumba dancer ever. I can’t bear the thought of giving it up!’ Honestly.”

“Sounds highly articulate to me,” observed Hannah.

“Don’t you think Boaz will coach him?”

“But  then,  why don’t you think he’ll coach him on  the loss of earnings?”

“Because I don’t think Boaz knows what you have up your  sleeve!” 

“But surely, Omri must know some dental technicians work from a wheelchair!”

“He may – but I don’t think he has told Boaz!” I said with confidence.

“He can’t  be that dumb!” countered Hannah.

“I  agree with Eli,” interceded Jacob Keren. “Many cases are lost  because  the client  keeps  facts from his lawyer. Such idiocy is more  damaging  than  the other party’s brilliant tactics!”

“Well, then, what do you suggest?”

“Tread  carefully on the ‘loss of enjoyment of life’ issue and go to  town  on the ‘future earnings’. Perhaps you should start with the former and leave  the cross-examination on the latter for a devastating finale.”

“I’d rather crush Omri at the start!” said Hannah.

“Well,  you are in charge. But I advocate extreme caution on the dancing issue. To my mind, Omri has been surprisingly  candid  with  our esteemed Mr. Almog. Beware of the double bluff!”

            For a moment I glanced at my boss in amazement. Usually, Jacob Keren would have insisted that his tactics be adopted or, in the very least, would have kept arguing. It then dawned on me that his acquiescence was natural. Although the Omri Tal matter remained, nominally, a case handled by J. Keren & Associates, the lead lawyer was Rotem’s new in-house counsel. In the circumstances, Keren saw no need to persevere.

            Having concluded our discussion of the strategy, we turned to the nitty gritty details of Omri  Tal’s claim. A meticulous calculation, carried out by Jacob  Keren  with the  aid of his old fashioned adding machine, convinced us that a settlement should not exceed a total of IL19,000 or 20,000 at the most. As Boaz had  told Ruth  Schwartz,  he  would  not “even consider”  a  settlement  for  less  than IL27,000, we were reluctant to make an overture.

“I  suspect  the best time for a frank chat will be a day or  two  before  the trial,” observed Jacob Keren. “They’ll feel less confident by then!” 

 

XI.  THE TRIAL

 

            Some three weeks after our conference with Keren, Hannah and I marched over to our dilapidated court building.  Boaz  looked well and at ease. In contrast, Omri Tal, who was sitting next to him, appeared nervous,  even apprehensive. He was talking in undertone with the singularly attractive girl, who was doing her best to calm him down.

              “Glad to see everybody’s on deck,” said  Baruch  Shoham, having  responded graciously when all of us rose to our feet and bowed as he entered the court room from his chambers.  Unlike the attorneys, who continued to wear gowns, the judge’s formal attire comprised a black silk jacket, a white shirt with a stiff collar and a sober tie.

“And you, Mr Tamir,” Shoham added as he relaxed in his comfortable  leather chair, “look much better! You must have followed your doctor’s orders to the letter!  And it is good to have the privilege of seeing you again in the ranks, Frau Hod.  I feared that Rotem’s gain might be our loss of your spirited appearances before us!”

“No such luck, Your Honour.  I’ll continue to be a thorn in the flesh of the courts for years to come, whenever Rotem sounds the all clear!”

            Everybody,  including  the Judge, guffawed.  Then all of us  turned our attention to the papers in front of us.  Shoham went through his file deftly, as persons do when they are in command of the contents.  When he had collected his thoughts, he cleared his throat and addressed both sides, “I take it neither party wishes to raise any objections to, or queries about, Dr. Alon Shaked’s medical report. It strikes me as very clear and meticulous.”

“Both parties found it most helpful,” confirmed Boaz.

“So, you have discussed it amongst yourselves?”

“We have indeed.  The defendants agree that, at this stage, it is impossible to state with certainty whether or not the plaintiff's injury is permanent.  The prognosis is that some disability will remain.”

“I too read the report in this way,” conceded Shoham.  “Can we then proceed on this basis? Are the parties ad idem to this extent?”

”We are,” confirmed Boaz.  “We are, further, agreed that, as Dr Shaked concludes, the permanent impairment will not be major.”

“Very well, then. So, unless either party wishes to raise a preliminary point, you, Mr Tamir, can commence with your opening.”

             For the next half hour, I listened attentively to Boaz’s meticulous statement of the plaintiff’s case.  As often before, I admired his delivery which was as elegant, as clear and as well balanced as any address delivered  by Jacob Keren.  What impressed me even more was the subtle manner in which he adapted his speech to suit the temperament and orientation of the Judge.  Had he appeared before Ehud Morag, Boaz would, undoubtedly, have included prolific references to recent cases, incorporating here and there a pun on some clumsy expression in a  judgment cited by him.  In Baruch Shoham’s court he covered, assiduously, each and every issue, leaving no corner unturned.

            It  was only when he came close to the end that, as I had  anticipated, Boaz  made a slip. Turning in the direction of Omri Tal, who was listening to him spell bound, Boaz became eloquent: “So, Your Honour, my client’s dream of becoming a household name amongst dancing fans in Israel has come to an abrupt end!  True, his permanent handicap may not be major.  Still, he will never leave the dancing floor again as the holder of the trophy awarded for any fast moving dance. True, social dancing, as well as a mediocre performance as an amateur chess player, remain within his reach. But he can no longer hope to become Israel’s undisputed Valentino.   His aspirations for success will now be confined to his professional career as a dental technician and even there he will have to cope with a handicap!”

“But Your Honour,” Hannah had risen to her feet, “doesn’t this argument suggest that, in the ultimate, the plaintiff’s shattered dream will have a beneficial effect on his career?  According to the argument just raised,  work will become his main solace!  Isn’t this fresh motivation bound to drive him from strength to strength in his profession!”

“The point occurred to me,” observed Shoham.  “But how about the adverse effect of his injury?”

“This question is in issue, Your Honour.  May we revert to it later on?”

“Very well,” said Shoham complacently.  It was, however, clear from his expression that the arrow had found its mark.  Boaz frowned, bestowed a searching glance on his client and, for just a second, remained lost in his thoughts.   He then turned back to his notes and brought his address to a swift conclusion.  

            “Thanks for this very comprehensive and clear address,” said Shoham benignly when Boaz finished. “Could you please furnish a copy of your address?  I’m sure our notes are accurate but we can’t be too careful!”  He was, implicitly, eluding to a problem that had plagued all Israeli courts in those remote days.  In the absence of sound equipment, judges and their associates had to take copious notes of everything said  in court, including the attorneys’ speeches and the testimony.  The parties too kept records.  Usually each entrusted the work to a pupil or a secretary and, at the end of each day, the respective ‘notes of proceedings’ were compared and reconciled.  In lengthy trials, the process was cumbersome.  Court stenographers were, as yet, a rarity.

“I note that the defendants are not calling witnesses but have reserved the right to call evidence in rebuttal,” observed Shoham.

“Judging from  the opening, I don’t think the need will arise,” answered Hannah.

Shoham let his satisfaction show “So we can take things easy.  It’s only 10.45.  Let’s have a 20 minutes break.  We can all do with a cup of coffee and the smokers with a cigarette!”

           When the proceedings resumed, Boaz put Omri Tal in the box.  As was the custom, the first, highly neutral and uncontroversial questions, were asked mainly in order to put the witness, who was fidgeting nervously, at ease.  To this end, Boaz invited Omri to tell us about his forthcoming move to Be’er Sheva and, generally, about his plans for the future.  As soon as Omri had regained his composure, Boaz turned to the relevant issue.  Cutting himself short on the liability issue, which was no longer in dispute, he asked a series of questions about Omri’s injuries and their effect on his work as a dental technician.  He also established the extent of Omri’s past losses  and laid the foundation for the argument respecting the loss of future earnings. Watching the two of them carefully, I surmised that Boaz had not put the 20 minutes break to good use, he still believed that a dental technician had to do his work standing on his feet.

             Boaz’s questions became more articulate when he turned to Omri’s loss of enjoyment of life.  In response to his carefully phrased questions, Omri told us all about the pleasure and pride he had experienced when he  won his trophies and about his aspirations to become Israel’s best known amateur dancing champion.  Omri readily conceded that, even after the accident, he continued to play an active role in his club as an instructor and  guide and that he stepped onto the parquet floor when they organised social dancing evenings. These  experiences, though, were a poor compensation for the irreparable loss he had suffered when his great expectations came to such  an abrupt end.

“I have not lost my hope for the future,” Omri Tal affirmed as the examination-in-chief  drew to its close. “But, whenever I  think  of  how  I performed on the floor before this stupid accident, I feel drained – empty.”

“No further questions,” said Boaz and resumed his seat on the front bench.

“It’s too early to break,” observed Baruch Shoham.  “But I suspect your cross-examination will take us well into the afternoon, Frau Hod.  And how about evidence in rebuttal?”

“Barring unexpected surprises we’ll do without such evidence.  And I may be able to finish just before lunch if we break, say, at 1.00pm or so?”

“That suits me,” nodded Shoham.  “Actually, I have a late luncheon engagement.  Let’s agree to break at about 13.00 hours.  You can carry on after the break if need be.”

            As was the norm amongst lawyers trained by Keren, Hannah skimmed through her notes leisurely, straightened her gown and kept frowning.  After a while, Omri Tal’s self-assured manner underwent a subtle  change.  He started to fidget and, once again, looked ill at ease.  

“Well, Mr Tal,” Hannah went straight to the point, “so this … not particularly substantial accident will stop you from rising to the top of your professional career?”

“If  You Honour pleases,” Boaz was up on his feet, “this is a loaded question.  Is my Learned Colleague asking whether the accident was substantial or does she want to know whether it will impede the development  of  my client’s career?”

“Let me then rephrase the question,” Hannah smiled tightly. “Mr. Tal, will the accident, the subject of this case, stop you from rising to the top of your professional career?” 

“The injury has slowed me down frightfully!”

“And why is that?”

“Because I can’t stand on my feet for any length of time.  My knee gets too painful and my leg feels uncomfortable!”  Boaz’s intervention had helped Omri to regain some of his self-assurance.

“And a dental technician has to do his work on his feet?”

“That’s the way I used to work before the accident!”

“Please answer my question, does a dental technician have to stand on his feet at work!  To make myself even clearer, can’t he work in a sitting posture?”

“My client is not here as an expert witness,” Boaz was up again, trying hard to hide his anxiety. “How can he testify about the work of a dental technician in general?”

“Does my Learned Colleague suggest he himself is unable to testify about the work of ‘a lawyer’?” Hannah asked sweetly.

            Baruch Shoham smiled and, instantly, gazed awkwardly at an unidentified point in front of his desk.  Boaz, in turn, started to make a reply, thought better of it, shrugged and sat down.

“Well, Mr. Tal, won’t you enlighten us?”

“I don’t know how other technicians work!” Omri protested, glancing anxiously in Boaz’s direction.

“Don’t you know Mr Joseph Cohen – the Dental Technician at 56 Herzl Street?  I believe he is the Honorary Treasurer of your Organisation?”

“I’ve met him!”

“Does he have any handicap?”

“Really, Your Honour!  Where does all this lead us?” Boaz rushed in.

“I’d better make myself clearer then”, Hannah raised her voice.  “Did you, Mr Tal, notice that Mr Cohen is a paraplegic, confined to a wheelchair!”

“I know,” agreed Omri cowed.

“And what is his reputation like?”

“Second to none,” conceded Omri.  “But I only said that I am used to doing my work standing on my feet.”

“But, if necessary, such work can be carried out even from a wheelchair!”

“I don’t know how?” Omri was cornered but, bravely, tried to stand his ground.

“Well, let us see,” said Hannah.


            For the next thirty minutes, Hannah cross-examined Omri meticulously on each phase and detail in the work of dental technicians.  When she finished, it was evident that, with some adjustments and reorganisation of the workstations on the premises, all processes and procedures could be carried out by a technician sitting at a workbench. She proceeded quickly, without pulling her punches, but at the same time kept glancing at Shoham  to ensure he was able to keep notes.  Using one of the few minutes of respite to steal a glance around me, I  caught the immobile expression that had descended on Boaz’s face.  A few minutes later, I was taken aback by the hostile glance he bestowed on his wriggling client.

             At  long last, Omri threw in the towel. Mopping  the  sweat off his brow, he confirmed: “Well, yes, I suppose that, in due course, I’ll learn how to  work from a chair. It’s not the way I was trained but, well, beggars can’t be choosers.”

“Come, come, Mr. Tal,” urged Hannah. “Don’t tell us you won’t be able to earn a living that way!”

“It'll slow me down!”

“By how much?”

“Quite a bit during the first few months!”

“But, say, during the next five years?”

“Perhaps 15 per cent?”

“And over 10 years?”

“Ten per cent or perhaps even less. I suppose I’ll get used to it.”

“So a 10 per cent loss of future earnings over ten years is as much as we have to contemplate.  As you are young and adjustable it might even be less than that!”

“It might,” Omri conceded.

            Smoothing her gown over again, Hannah whispered to me, “OK on the earnings?  Start on the dancing?”

“Fine on the earning, but go slow on the dancing.  He volunteered he’s not lost his hopes for the future.  I smell a rat!”

 “Let’s see.”  Drunk with the success of the last half hour, she turned  back to the cowed Omri Tal.  Like a matador brandishing his sword in the face of an exhausted bull, she got ready for the kill.

“Let’s now turn to your alleged loss of enjoyment of life, Mr Tal.  By all accounts you were a gifted amateur dancer!”

“I was, and I could have ended right at the top.” Omri regained some of his spirit.

“But there are no certainties?”

“True, but my record speaks for itself!”

“But could you have kept training as assiduously as needed while your practice developed?”

“Dancing was first priority!”  Lifting my head from my note pad, I spotted a smiling Boaz, who gave me a roguish wink when our eyes met.

“So, your accident, regrettable as it has been, may have had a positive effect on your career!”

“Man doesn’t live on bread alone!” was the pointed reply.

“But it’s good to have plenty of it!”

“I agree,” countered Omri, regaining the composure he had displayed during the examination-in-chief.  “Sometimes I can’t concentrate on my work because  I keep thinking of my lost dancing career!”

“But isn’t time a great healer?  Won’t you come to terms with life in time?”

“I don’t think I ever will.  I’ve tried to put my dancing career behind me.  I’ve done my best to forget about it.  I’ve really tried.  But every time I watch others perform on the floor, I feel empty, hollow, out of place! I’m like a singer who lost his voice!”  He had pronounced the last few words intently, fervently.  I knew that  Boaz’s  skilful tutelage might have fine tuned Omri’s script.  All the same, Omri’s sentiments carried conviction.

“But despite your frustrations you go to your club once or twice a week?”

“So as not to be cut off altogether!”

“And let’s face it: you do dance!”

“Only when we  have social evenings; and only slow moving,  old fashioned dances!”

“But,” Hannah brandished one of Joseph Almog’s reports, “sometimes you keep going for two or even three hours.”

“I do, although it ain’t easy!”

“But how???”

“I take pain killers on each occasion!”

“Pain killers? Do you mean an aspirin?”

“Something stronger than that,” muttered Omri, looking injured.

“Like what?” intervened Baruch Shoham.

“I take Petidin, You Honour,” confessed Omri.

“Petidin,” Shoham was aghast.  “That's an opiate, Mr Tal.  How do you get access to that?”

“My GP, Dr Levi, prescribes it!”

“Your GP!?” Shoham was leaning over his desk, looking at the young man in the witness box with unconcealed concern and alarm.  “What on earth is he up to?  Petidin is a heavy-duty drug, to be taken on rare  occasions when the patient experiences acute, uncontrollable, pain like in the early phase of a badly slipped disk! Petidin should not be prescribed regularly!”

“I think this is why Dr Levi gives me only enough for two days a week,” explained Omri. “He has refused, flatly, to give me any more or to increase the dosage.”

“But why does he give it to you at all?” Shoham persevered. “Why doesn’t he prescribe something milder - less addictive?”

“He tried, but it didn’t work.”

“So why didn’t he tell you to stop dancing, at least for a while?”

“We tried but I was getting terribly depressed.  I couldn’t work or eat and didn’t even want to see my friends.”

“Didn’t he send you to a psychiatrist?” Hannah stepped in adroitly.

“Dr Levi practises also as a psychiatrist,” said Omri lamely, whilst I bestowed an admiring glance on my friend Boaz who was smirking contentedly.

“But then,” asked  Hannah unthinkingly, “why doesn’t Dr Levi prescribe medicines to help you to overcome your handicap at work?”

“But, Frau Hod,” Baruch Shoham stepped in urbanely. “We've just been told that Dr Levi prescribed the drug in moderation.  I can tell you, from my own experience, how dangerous it is.  I used it when my back gave way some four years ago.  I needed Dr. Shaked’s help to kick it off before it was too late.  Oh no – we don’t want our young generation to be turned into drug addicts.”  Shuffling through his notes for a few seconds, he turned back to Omri Tal: “But, Mr Tal, why didn’t you mention the problem to Dr. Shaked.”

“Actually, I did.”

“You did? Oh yes ... so this explains Dr. Shaked’s reference to your having to use pain killers from time to time.  Well, yes, I take the point.  And you better ask Dr Levi to refer you back to Dr Shaked for a further opinion about the medication.  Two views are better than one!”  Turning to Hannah, Baruch Shoham said, “But I really shouldn’t take the thunder out of your  cross-examination.  The floor is yours!  Please do continue!”

            Looking forlorn, Hannah mechanically smoothed her gown over once again and looked at me anxiously. She was as deflated as Omri had appeared at the end of the first phase of her cross examination.

“Get him to confirm he’s still looking forward to the future and ask about Be’er Sheva. We’ve got nothing to lose there,” I whispered.

“Thanks,” she muttered and turned back to the self assured Omri who was purring contentedly.

“Well, Mr Tal,” she said in a conciliatory tone, “but despite the regrettable accident you do have your hopes for the future.”

“I do. I’ve already said so.”

“So, your attitude to life has remained positive!”

“It has; it has to be; if you don’t keep your head high everybody tramples all over you.”

“So, in the long run, you will try to remain a valuable member of society?”

 “I shall indeed!”

“And so the accident has not marred your hopes. It has not taken the joy of life away from you altogether?” asked Hannah.

“It hasn’t,” conceded Omri readily.

“And you are looking forward to your move to Be’er Sheva?”

“I do!”

“How about your departure from your club in Ramat Gan?” asked Hannah, whilst I caught my breath. The answer could, easily, turn the tables on us once again. Omri, though, remained positive, “We have already founded a new club in Be’er Sheva.  I’ve been voted President and Chief Instructor.”

“I am sure all of us wish you success and satisfaction!” congratulated Baruch Shoham.

“I couldn’t agree more,” affirmed Hannah, back to her ebullient self.  Taking in my gesture, she added, “No further questions, Your Honour.”

“Any re-examination, Mr Tamir?” asked Shoham, giving the side that called the witness the chance to repair any damage done in the cross-examination.

“None, Your Honour.”

“Thank you Mr. Tal; you are excused,” said Baruch Shoham, indicating that  Omri Tal’s ordeal was over.

“This is the plaintiff's case,” announced Boaz, indicating he was not calling any further witnesses.

“The defence is not calling witnesses” advised Hannah.

“So you'll have the last word. Well, it’s 12.45.  So I suggest you, Mr Tamir, address us when we reconvene after lunch.”

“Actually,” said  Hannah,  “our  firm waives the right to  speak  last  in  all accident cases we defend.  So, if Your Honour pleases, I shall speak first.”

“That’s very decent,” countered Boaz. “But, actually, Your Honour, the parties had earlier on considered asking you to suggest a settlement.  As all the evidence is now on record, I wonder if this might perhaps be a good time?”

“It would, rather,” agreed Hannah.

“In that case, I suggest we reconvene in my Chambers at, say, 14.45. This will give the parties adequate time to get instructions and will enable me to go over my notes.”

  

XII.   MEANDERINGS DURING THE RECESS

 

            As soon as the judge left the Courtroom, Boaz departed in the company of Omri and his attractive fiancée.  Hannah left in a hurry, mumbling she had to report to Ruth Schwartz.  Fearing David Mizrachi’s eatery would be crowded, I crossed the road to a nearby sandwiches and coffee bar. Munching away, I started to soliloquise about the events of  the morning and about the legal fraternity.

            My years with Jacob Keren’s firm convinced me that law and drama coincided mainly in films and in poorly written books.  Undoubtedly, every trial had had its tense and often unpredictable moment.  But I had never seen a witness crumbling in the box and coming up with a tearful confession.  Most trials were less momentous than the Omri Tal case. Victory  was  secured  by careful  preparation,  sound  tactics  and skilful  arguments.  On many occasions the final result was dictated by sheer luck.

            Lawyers, too, were not the Olympian heroes portrayed by writers of fiction.  By and large, lawyers fell into three groups.  Just a handful were super stars.  The bulk of the profession was comprised of practitioners  reasonably competent in their chosen fields.  The rest – fortunately a minority –  slogged on notwithstanding their incompetence.  Abraham Kadmon, who had had great expectations in his early days, was a case in point. Somehow, he managed to hang on despite the steadily increasing number of his failures in court. Generally, though, useless advocates like him were weeded out by the market when their disappointed clients turned elsewhere. 

            A competent lawyer did not have to possess outstanding skills.  His tools of trade were good memory cum concentration and the ability to assimilate facts and to comprehend and recall the contents of documents. Obviously, the craft of establishing  rapport with court and with witnesses, the gift of repartee and the ability to think quickly on ones feet were valuable assets.  By and large, though, these could be acquired in the course of   practice.  Colleagues, who had appeared hopeless in their first few cases, often became capable technicians as  time passed by.

Few of them, though, could rise any higher.  Having observed most of the super stars of the older generation, I had come to realise that they were set apart from their fellow practitioners by qualities that could not be acquired by mere training or dedication.  These comprised a robust constitution that enabled each of them to carry on when lesser mortals had long exhausted themselves, an uncanny ability to assess a situation effortlessly,  an  ability to analyse legal points and a vivid imagination.  In addition, each of them had a special gift which was best described as his individual forté.

            During his years at the Bar, Ehud Morag had been admired for his unparalleled handling of subtle legal points.  His sharp tongue, too, was a fine asset. Other lawyers feared its lashes. From amongst the current  virtuosos, Jacob Keren excelled in tactical skills and meticulous planning.  These enabled him to avoid traps and to place smart obstacles to hamper his opponents.  Boaz Tamir’s boss, Israel Silver, could not match Jacob Keren on those fronts.  But his masterful delivery and his presence of mind were often just as effective.  I had seen him shrugging off bombshells which would have demolished any other lawyer.  Silver used to come up with a convincing counter reply or move.

            I knew, that like most of my contemporaries, I was unlikely to become a courtroom star.  My poor timing and tendency to get lost in my thoughts compounded my  inadequate manoeuvring ability when on my feet.  In time, I should develop into a competent lawyer; that, though, was my limit. Hannah, too, was not going to rise  above the ranks.  Her performance in the Omri Tal case underscored her faults.  Boaz Tamir, in contrast, was a young man of promise.  His masterly delivery, excellent rapport with the  judge and his fine tactical skills should in due course compensate for his somewhat inadequate analytical ability and occasional lapses. With the help of reliable supporting staff  he  might, in due course, reach the same standard as his current employer.

            Wiping my lips after I had drained my cup of coffee, my thoughts turned to the new leader of my team: Rachel Zeitlin.  Instantly, my face brightened, in recent months she had become the centre of my life.  I had been captivated by her trim figure, lush hair, self-assured manner and gift of repartee; and I was proud of our fine professional record.  Out of the six cases we had handled since Jacob Keren pronounced us a team, we won five, including three Keren had described as hopeless.  And we had settled the remaining one on favourable terms.

            We had celebrated our latest victory in a fashionable restaurant in Jaffa.  Rachel insisted on settling  the  bill, left a generous tip and, with a twinkle in her eye, observed it was high time she made a man out of me.  She then drove us over to her comfortable flat on Nordau Boulevard.

             “A penny for your thoughts,” Boaz’ resonant voice interrupted my daydreaming.

“I was reflecting on an old question, Boaz”, I answered readily. “What does it take to become a star lawyer?”

“Luck, competence and above all perseverance.”

“Luck and competence are essential; but is perseverance that important?”

“It’s crucial, without it you sink.”

“How about Hannah?”

“She perseveres. But look at her performance this morning: she lacks judgment.”

“And Rachel Zeitlin?” I asked, trying to sound casual.

“I thought you were thinking of her,” grinned Boaz. “Your expression when you sat there all on your own told its tale.  And, to your, question, Rachel will make it with you by her side; not on her own.”

“Why?” I protested, blushing scarlet. “She is always in the lead!”

 “But without your pushing, she’d take things easy.  Rachel likes her comforts.  And, Eli, she’s not really good when it comes  to legal points.”

“Perhaps; but her delivery is brilliant, and she is not easily rattled.”

“Quite,” agreed Boaz. “But she needs somebody to spur her on and be around when needed, and you love to work with her.”

“How  about  yourself,  Boaz; do you think you’ll make it to the top league?” I thought it best to change  the  subject.  “I’m confident you can get there; but sometimes I’m not sure if  that’s what you want.”

“Spot on,” smiled Boaz.  “And look here, Eli, how much respect and admiration do you feel for our super stars?”

“They are great lawyers!”

“But do you enjoy their company? Do you regard any one of them as a model member of our society?”

“Perhaps not, but nobody’s perfect.”

“True.  But what’s the point in slogging it out for years, rising at 4 o'clock in the morning to get ready for your next appearance at 9.00am only to drop onto your bed, flat out, as soon as you get back home late at night? Is this the sort of life you aspire to?”

“I won’t make it in any event.  I’m not robust and my timing is poor. But you can make it.”

“I made a few booboos today. I don’t know how I let that blasted Omri pull the wool over my eyes on the working method. I made a fool of myself!”

“But  you won’t make that mistake again.  And it’s not as if today’s luminaries  were good right from day one.”

“True.  Silver, you may be interested to know, likes to amuse us with stories of gaffs he made in his early cases.”

“So, you see! And today your performance on the loss of enjoyment of life issue compensated.  Actually, how did you work out that bit about the Petidin?”

“I had a spot of luck there,” conceded Boaz. “Baruch Shoham’s bad back is common knowledge and I’ve spotted the pill bottles on his desk.  I put two and two together.”

“And the Dr Levi business?  Did you send Omri to him?”

“Off the record and between friends?”

“Sure!”

“Well,  I met Levi in the army. He handled the case of a trooper of mine who busted his knee in training. Levi’s a fine doctor and knows how to relate to difficult patients.  And like all GPs with an interest in psychiatry  he’s a good man when you need some ... unorthodox arrow to your bow!”

“Brilliant!”

“But, still off the record, you suspected something was wrong?”

“Still talking in confidence – so did Jacob Keren!”

“But Hannah Hod refused to listen.  She had to lead with her chin to prove she was Miss Know All. That – in a nutshell – is why she’ll never make it! But enough of that.  We’ve got to talk about the case.  Have you given any further thought to a settlement?”

“You better have a word with Hannah. I’m sure she’s discussed the matter with Ruth Schwartz during the break!”

 

XIII.  SETTLEMENT


           At 2.45pm, Hannah, Boaz and myself rose as Baruch Shoham took his place at the head of the conference table in his chambers.

“Well,” he said benignly, “I hope everybody had a pleasant lunch?”

“Thank you, Judge,” Hannah assured him on behalf of all present.

“And have you had any discussion about a suitable figure?”

“We are still rather apart, Judge,” volunteered Hannah.  “I believe both parties would like to have your view on the matter.”

 “But it would help me greatly to know where you were heading for.  It’s always easier to come up with a reasonable proposal after hearing the parties’ views.  Needless to say, our discussion in this room is off the record and without prejudice.  If no agreement is reached, I’ll listen to formal arguments.”

“I discussed the subject with my Learned Colleague just before we resumed,” responded  Hannah.  “We  made a firm offer of  IL18,000.  The plaintiff was prepared to take 26,000.  But I think it’s only fair to say that, despite the substantial gap, both parties remained somewhat flexible.”

“You mean there’s some leeway?”

“Quite so, Judge,” affirmed Boaz.

“That’ll do,” said Baruch Shoham.  “As it happens, the figure I am about to propose is within the margin. But before I refer to it I want the parties to know how I arrived at it.  You see, I was most impressed with the plaintiff’s positive attitude to life.  It came across during the cross-examination about his working technique.  Once the feasibility of working in a sitting posture was demonstrated to him, he confirmed he ought to be able  to adjust. His main loss is the abrupt termination  of  his  dancing career:  he  had put his heart and soul into to it and his great dreams were nipped in the bud.  True, his approach to life remains positive, his forthcoming move to Be’er Sheva underscores the point. But, as he himself told us, man does not live on bread alone. And I  sympathise.  These considerations led me, originally, to contemplate an all-in  figure of say IL23,000.”

Shoham stopped for a moment, took his breath, reflected and then went on.  “My assessment underwent a change when I discussed the case over lunch with my Brother Ehud Morag. You will recall that, originally, the case had been assigned to him and so he was quite conversant with the facts.  He is also an avid dancer. Accordingly, he has a special ability to identify with Omri Tal’s predicament.  Well, you can gauge my surprise when Ehud Morag took the view that an amateur dancer’s career was usually short lived.  Very few enthusiasts could keep up with their training.  In addition, they found their professional career clashing with their hobby.  Morag further said that, after a while, many amateurs started to find dancing somewhat boring.  So Omri Tal’s accident resulted in an early termination of a hobby which might, in any event, have lost its spell sooner or later on different grounds.  Moreover, Omri Tal had apparently solved his immediate problem by turning himself into a teacher and dancing instructor.  In the circumstances, Ehud Morag opined that a settlement of some IL17,000 would be just and fair.”

            Once again, Baruch Shoham broke off, collected his thoughts, leafed quickly through notes he had made during the lunch break and, then, summed up.  “After careful consideration, I concluded that my Brother Morag took a rather hard line.  Undoubtedly, like the rest of us, Omri Tal would one day have to come to terms with the wear and tear inflicted by time.  Still, my own impression, based on the evidence, was that for the time being Omri Tal would have continued to regard his dancing hobby as a major commitment in  his life.  In consequence, I recommend a settlement of an all-in figure of IL21,000.00.  May I suggest that Counsel discuss this proposal  with their respective clients and come back to me. Shall we resume in 20 minutes?”

             “My client, Judge, has decided to accept,” affirmed Boaz when we resumed.

“So does Rotem.”

            “So, the case is settled.” Shoham spoke with satisfaction and, addressing me, instructed, “Mr Berger, will you kindly draw up the agreement and submit the draft to Mr Tamir for approval.  I’ll issue my order as soon as I’ve heard from the parties.”

 It pleased me that Shoham, the ever tactful and considerate man, had remembered the importance of drawing junior lawyers into the fold by giving them some role to play.  “Thank you, Judge,” I told him.

             When we left the chambers, Hannah shook Omri Tal’s hand and wished him all the best.  Rising to the occasion and playing his part, the one time Valentino invited us to visit him in Be’er Sheva.  To my surprise, he added with a twinkle in his eye.  “And please give my warmest regards to Mr Shalom Cohen.  We are looking  forward to seeing him at our wedding.  I’ll send  his  invitation care of Boaz.”

 

 XIV.  POST MORTEM

 

            Eager to make her report to Ruth Schwartz, Hannah left straightaway.  Boaz and I spent some time drafting the settlement document and then walked back together, wadding our way through the thin, aggravating, drizzle.  As if by agreement, we dropped into David Mizrachi’s eatery.   Lunch time was long over but both of  us  felt the need for a cup of his strong brewed aromatic coffee.

“What was that odd crack about Shalom Cohen?” I asked as I wiped the raindrops off my face.  “I didn’t know Hannah and Omri had common friends?”

“He meant Joseph Almog,” grinned Boaz. “Shalom Cohen was the nom-de-plume Almog used for this job!”

“How did you identify him?”

“Originally, when Almog became so friendly, Omri suspected he was after his girl.  But when Almog kept snooping about the effects of the accident, Omri had second thoughts.  When the telephone book yielded no information about a Shalom Cohen at the given address, Omri showed me the photos taken at the engagement  party.  Well, Eli, we too use Mr Joseph Almog from time to time!”

“And didn’t you use Almog to feed us a line?” I muttered.

“Perish the thought,” grinned Boaz.  “What do you think we are? No, Eli, shall we say that we edited some information for your benefit!”

“You mean, selectively edited,” I grumbled.

“Let’s not split hair.  Wouldn’t your Jacob Keren love to  do  the same to us?”

“Wouldn’t he ever.  All in all, Boaz, I have to say, well done, very cool indeed!”

“That’s better.  Our case went on so smoothly until you had these two breaks this morning!”

“Two?”

“Precisely, to start with, my idiot of a client tried to be clever about some facts.  Still, we braved that storm thanks to help from the benign Frau Hod.  But then came Shoham's ‘informal chat’ with Ehud Morag.  That, Eli, did it!”

“And to think Keren wanted to get Morag off the case!” I observed.

“For once your boss was out of touch.  Ehood Morag’s views about dancing changed radically when his charming Varda said goodbye!”

“When did this happen?”

“A few weeks before we took out our writ in the Omri Tal case.  Morag’s wife was disenchanted when they failed to win back the Waltz trophy.  She eloped with the current Waltz King!”

“What???”

“You see, that chap’s dancing partner was his own sister. When she migrated to New York, he started to make eyes at Varda; and she succumbed!”

“Just because of the waltzing? What a bitch!”

“No, Eli, you mustn’t say that.  Varda’s a good friend of Miri.  For years Varda suffered patiently all of Ehood’s nonsense: his long lapses into other worlds when he was on a case; his incessant preoccupation with work; his inability to face everyday problems.  The disappointment on the floor was  the last straw.”

“Poor chap,” I said feelingly. “He can’t help being what he is!”

“That,” Boaz spoke severely, “is a good excuse for any scoundrel. But be this as it may, Morag’s resulting disenchantment with dancing tells it own tale about the man’s megalomania!  Morag can do no wrong! Varda’s elopement must be the fault of the Waltz, although it appeared such a rewarding pastime yesterday!”

“We’ll have to agree to disagree about Morag.  Still, his new orientation proved a good stroke of luck for us.”

“Or an appallingly bad one for my poor client: why should Varda’s desertion of her dear Ehud have any bearing on the settlement offered to Omri  Tal  this morning?”

“I’ve got to agree with you there,” I conceded.  “Still, a twenty one thousand Pounds settlement is not to be sneezed at.”

“Not when your income is IL4,000 per annum,” agreed Boaz.

“But that is precisely what Omri was earning,” I pointed out.

“That, Eli, is the taxed income on which he had to base his claim!”

“Oh well,” I said, seeing light. “We thought he might have earned a bit more  on the side.”

“And how much did you think he was making on the sly?”

“We didn’t really give the matter much thought.  Say another 400 or 500 pounds?”

“Omri Tal’s moonlighting brought him an extra IL6,000 per year.  I’ve seen his ‘confidential books’, Eli.”

“Six thousand,” I was stunned. “So that chap earned about ten thousand a  year.  That’s  as  much  as  Keren or Silver.”

“Yes, Eli. Omri Tal was making as  much  as our top lawyers.  And none of them has much to hide.  They have to issue receipts!”

“And Omri couldn’t base his claim on real earnings for fear of prosecution?”

“The Income Tax people have been after him for a few years.  The stupid idiot put most of his black money into a luxury apartment purchased in his own name.  They gave him the benefit of the doubt when he said the money was left to  him by a relative in America.  But they’ve kept a watchful eye.”

“Oh, well; but didn’t he get back to his tricks when he returned to work?”

“No,  he didn’t.  Didn’t something catch your eye when you went over his employment record?”

“Before he started his own business he was a job hopper!  We wondered why he changed jobs so often. He seems a good tradesman.”

“An excellent one.  But he was too greedy.  He pinched clients when he was still with a firm, got dentists to send work to his own backroom establishment at slashed prices.  When his employers found out, they showed him the door.   None of them reported him because they too had jam on their fingers.”

“I see.   But what was there to stop him in his tracks when he was back on deck?”

“Just before the accident he engaged two assistants. The silly idiot trusted them.  Well, when he had the accident they did a dirty on him!”

“Serve him right,” I muttered.  “But still, why didn’t he undercut them further once he got well?”

“He  tried, but the margin got very low and the risk became too high.  He went to see them and they agreed to buy him out.”

“Joseph Almog’s last report mentioned Omri had sold his practice for IL3,000” I nodded, “not exactly riches!”

“But he’s getting another four thousand from them as soon as he opens his new workshop in Be’er Sheva. Israel Silver is the stakeholder!’

“So that explains why Omri is in such a hurry to get down South?”

“That and because he’s really fed up with Tel Aviv.  Give him credit for that, Eli.  Be charitable!”

“Not an easy task. I think about the pittance Israel Silver and Jacob Keren pay to hard working characters like you and me.  Pfui, Boaz!  Pfui to charity!”

“Don’t get hot under the collar, Eli.  Think of the fame we’ll gain while Omri continues to repair filthy dentures and works  from casts sucked in saliva!”

“You’ve got a point there,” I sighed.  “But don’t tell me money doesn’t count.  I shudder to think of Keren’s reaction when Rotem’s in-house accountants haggle over our forthcoming fee note.  Hannah and I will cop it!  Hopefully, you’ll do better with Omri!”

“You must be joking!”

“Surely, in the very least you get our sainted scale fees!”

“Scale fees!” Boaz, lost his cool.  “When it comes to money, Omri Tal is a bastard. He’s paying only 60 per cent of the scale fees.  And I, Eli, got an omelette on my face this morning!  And I put in over 200 hours of work!”

“Why on earth did you accept such a rotten deal?”

“Because some two years ago Omri Tal amused himself by trying to teach me chess openings.  I’m still as lousy as before.  Still, Omri Tal used that ‘help’ as a lever to demand a hefty discount when he brought me  this rotten case.  And on top of it, he bloody well pulled the wool over my eyes!”

“So, we are all left holding the sack,” I could not resist giving vent to  my feelings.  “Omri gets what is, in reality, a poor settlement, you are chewed up, Hannah makes a fool of herself; and our firm will earn what  Rotem graciously consent to pay in due course.  The old Israelites were more lucky than us: Manna from heaven for a leisurely stroll across the desert!”

“Care to try it?” grinned Boaz.

“No, thank you.  I’d better stick to the Law.   Jacob Keren’s firm  ain’t paradise, but in the very least it’s not a wilderness.”

 

XV.  PLANNING OUR FUTURE

 

“Well Eli,” said Boaz after a short lull. “This is a good a time to bring up a point I wanted to raise with you for a while.  As you say, Keren’s firm isn’t paradise, ditto for Israel Silver’s outfit.  Why don’t we make ourselves independent?”

“Start a new practice?  There are some two hundred law firms in Tel Aviv?”

“Even so, don’t you think we can make it?  We had good training and we’ve worked well together as a team in law school!”

“But how about ...”

“I’m pretty sure Rachel Zeitlin will approve.  I’ve dropped a hint her way a few days ago, and she told me to talk to you first.  And I have already identified a good documentation lawyer.  We’ll need one. Well, are you interested?”

“Subject to a chat with Rachel.  But from what you say, I’m pretty sure she’ll agree.” 

“So let’s agree in principle,” said Boaz with satisfaction.  “There is, of course, no hurry.  At this stage, we still have a lot learn from the grand old men.  Still, in a year or perhaps in two we’ll be ready.  And there’ll be nothing to stop us!”

“Precisely,” I said and shook his outstretched hand.

 

            For a  few minutes, both of us were lost in our  thoughts.   Eventually, Boaz broke the silence, “I’ll have to make a move now. And it’s really high time you come over to our place again.  Oh yes, and do bring Rachel with you. Miri is dying to meet  your girl friend.”

“We’ll come over early next week.”

“See you then.  Do give us a ring, Miri is sure to prepare something special to impress Rachel.  See you soon.”

 

            Looking  around  me after Boaz had left, I realised there was no other patron in the establishment.  I was about to leave when David Mizrachi came over with two steaming mugs of coffee.

“Please, Mr Eli, I need your advice.”

“How can I help you, David,” I said when he joined the table and placed one mug in front of me.

David Mizrachi curled his long sideburns nervously with his right hand.  “You see, Mr Eli, Sarah and I have a big plan.  We make a little bit of money here; good money.  Two years ago I bought the  whole building.”

“You are a capitalist, David,” I said amused.

“I’m not sure what you mean,  Mr. Eli. But you see, now it is our house. So, Mr. Eli, we want to make this a large restaurant, with nice tables, colourful tablecloth, and good chairs.  You know what I mean?”

“But  David,” I let my concern show, “you’ll have to raise your  prices and  then  many of us will have to go to some other place.  And  this will  be sad.”

“No, Mr. Eli, the prices will be the same.  We want our guests to be happy.  And in a bigger place we will have more guests; so, no need to raise prices.  We’ll make less from one meal but more because we serve more!”

“Good  financial planning.  You, David, should have been a banker!”

“Too complicated, Mr. Eli.  For us the restaurant is good enough.  But now, Mr. Eli, here is my problem: we want to give our new restaurant a grand name – a name with quality!”

 “What sort of name are you looking for, David?”

“I want lawyers to come to our place.  The name must make them feel at home, Mr. Eli.”

“That’s simple, David.  Why not call it, ‘The Lucky Lawyers Haven’?”

“Why ‘Luck’ and ‘Haven?” wondered David.

“Because lawyers know success depends on luck.  And a ‘haven’ is where they hide to get away from pressure at work!”

“Thanks Mr. Eli. Sarah and I will think it over.  Would you like another coffee, or perhaps a Humus?  It’s on  the house.”

“Thanks, David.  But it’s getting late, and I have to pick up Miss Zeitlin. We go to Habimah this evening.”

“Have a good time then, Mr. Eli, and come again soon,” said David warmly.

 

            Outside it was drizzling.  Shrugging my shoulders in resignation, I pulled up the collar of my raincoat.  I was on my  way  to meet Rachel: neither the rain nor the cold wind wiped  an  inward looking smile – a smile of anticipation – off my face.

 

                                                                                                                                     

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ravages of a Guillotine

Reason on a Scaffolding